Literature DB >> 27428778

Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.

Brennan R Payne1, Mallory C Stites1, Kara D Federmeier1.   

Abstract

In 2 experiments, we examined the impact of foveal semantic expectancy and congruity on parafoveal word processing during reading. Experiment 1 utilized an eye-tracking gaze-contingent display change paradigm, and Experiment 2 measured event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in a modified flanker rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. Eye-tracking and ERP data converged to reveal graded effects of foveal load on parafoveal processing. In Experiment 1, when word n was highly expected, and thus foveal load was low, there was a large parafoveal preview benefit to word n + 1. When word n was unexpected but still plausible, preview benefits to n + 1 were reduced in magnitude, and when word n was semantically incongruent, the preview benefit to n + 1 was unreliable in early pass measures. In Experiment 2, ERPs indicated that when word n was expected, and thus foveal load was low, readers successfully discriminated between valid and orthographically invalid previews during parafoveal perception. However, when word n was unexpected, parafoveal processing of n + 1 was reduced, and it was eliminated when word n was semantically incongruent. Taken together, these findings suggest that sentential context modulates the allocation of attention in the parafovea, such that covert allocation of attention to parafoveal processing is disrupted when foveal words are inconsistent with expectations based on various contextual constraints. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27428778      PMCID: PMC5083148          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  69 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.

Authors:  W Schroyens; F Vitu; M Brysbaert; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1999-11

3.  Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?

Authors:  A W Inhoff; M Starr; K L Shindler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-10

4.  Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language.

Authors:  C Van Petten; S Coulson; S Rubin; E Plante; M Parks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects.

Authors:  D van den Brink; C M Brown; P Hagoort
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight.

Authors:  M M Müller; P Malinowski; T Gruber; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Sara C Sereno; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 9.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Raymond Bertram; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

10.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  11 in total

1.  The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.

Authors:  Michelle Leckey; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The Effect of Emotional State on the Processing of Morphosyntactic and Semantic Reversal Anomalies in Japanese: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Masataka Yano; Yui Suzuki; Masatoshi Koizumi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02

3.  Getting ahead of yourself: Parafoveal word expectancy modulates the N400 during sentence reading.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Event-related brain potentials reveal how multiple aspects of semantic processing unfold across parafoveal and foveal vision during sentence reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The language of arithmetic across the hemispheres: An event-related potential investigation.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Event-related brain potentials reveal age-related changes in parafoveal-foveal integration during sentence processing.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Spill the load: Mixed evidence for a foveal load effect, reliable evidence for a spillover effect in eye-movement control during reading.

Authors:  Eva Findelsberger; Florian Hutzler; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.

Authors:  Maryam A AlJassmi; Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.