Literature DB >> 21484486

Effect of the informed consent process on anxiety and comprehension of patients undergoing esophageal and gastrointestinal surgery.

Simonetta Betti1, Andrea Sironi, Greta Saino, Cristian Ricci, Luigi Bonavina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to evaluate the level of anxiety, recall, and comprehension of the provided information in patients undergoing esophageal and gastrointestinal surgery.
METHODS: Sixty-one patients without cognitive disorders entered a prospective study designed to assess the effect of a surgical informed consent process. The written informed consent was administered to all patients and was supported by a verbal explanation and a schematic drawing of the operation. The State Trait Anxiety Inventory test was used to assess state anxiety and tract anxiety. The test was repeated after the informed consent process. A disease-specific feedback questionnaire was subsequently administered to assess the actual comprehension of the provided information.
RESULTS: A significant decrease of the state anxiety scores was documented in most patients (p < 0.001). This effect was more evident in the elderly (p = 0.021) and in those who used Internet as a previous source of information (p = 0.032). The mean correct exact answer rate on the disease-specific questionnaire was 76% (IQ range 66.7-85%). No statistically significant relationship was found between the rate of correct answers and the state anxiety scores.
CONCLUSIONS: An exhaustive surgical informed consent process was effective in providing comprehension and decreasing anxiety in patients who are candidates to minimally invasive esophageal and gastrointestinal surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21484486     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1517-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  14 in total

1.  The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients' anesthetic concerns.

Authors:  C H Kindler; C Harms; F Amsler; T Ihde-Scholl; D Scheidegger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Authors:  J R Cockrell; M F Folstein
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1988

Review 3.  The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.

Authors:  A J Lloyd
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

4.  Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  R Parameswaran; J M Blazeby; R Hughes; K Mitchell; R G Berrisford; S A Wajed
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Predictors of comprehension during surgical informed consent.

Authors:  Aaron S Fink; Allan V Prochazka; William G Henderson; Debra Bartenfeld; Carsie Nyirenda; Alexandra Webb; David H Berger; Kamal Itani; Thomas Whitehill; James Edwards; Mark Wilson; Cynthia Karsonovich; Patricia Parmelee
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures.

Authors:  Mayer Brezis; Sarah Israel; Avital Weinstein-Birenshtock; Pnina Pogoda; Ayelet Sharon; Renana Tauber
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  A laparoscopy-assisted surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Davide Bona; Pierre René Binyom; Alberto Peracchia
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Jonas Apitzsch; Jonas Apitsch; Rainer Obliers; Armin Koerfer; Stefan P Mönig; Ralf Metzger; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  An audit of the knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards Surgical Informed Consent (SIC).

Authors:  Bushra Ashraf; Nasira Tasnim; Muhammad Saaiq; Khaleeq-Uz- Zaman
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-27

2.  The impact of dental phobia on patient consent.

Authors:  S Muschik; J Kallow
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  ADENOTONSILLECTOMY: CARE GIVERS' RECALL OF INFORMATION ON RISKS PROVIDED DURING INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS.

Authors:  E D Kitcher; K Searyoh; B Abaidoo; W Siale; S Sackitey; E Nyamekye
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

4.  An investigation of the efficacy of electronic consenting interfaces of research permissions management system in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Kapil Chalil Madathil; Reshmi Koikkara; Jihad Obeid; Joel S Greenstein; Iain C Sanderson; Katrina Fryar; Jay Moskowitz; Anand K Gramopadhye
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Alessandro Borello; Alessia Ferrarese; Roberto Passera; Alessandra Surace; Silvia Marola; Claudio Buccelli; Massimo Niola; Pierpaolo Di Lorenzo; Maurizio Amato; Lorenza Di Domenico; Mario Solej; Valter Martino
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-12-16

6.  Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: A meta-analysis for last decade.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Xiao-Ming Tian; Si-Kai Liu; Hui Wang; Ying-Ze Zhang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  A randomized trial of multimedia-facilitated informed consent for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Thomas A Vo; Philip Ngai; Jeremiah P Tao
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-10

8.  Does written informed consent adequately inform surgical patients? A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Erminia Agozzino; Sharon Borrelli; Mariagrazia Cancellieri; Fabiola Michela Carfora; Teresa Di Lorenzo; Francesco Attena
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  A survey of the current practice of the informed consent process in general surgery in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Wouter Kg Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Saskia Houterman; Margot Veerman; Johan Legemaate; Marc R Scheltinga
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-01-21

Review 10.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Apurva Ashok; Devayani Niyogi; Priya Ranganathan; Sandeep Tandon; Maheema Bhaskar; George Karimundackal; Sabita Jiwnani; Madhavi Shetmahajan; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.549

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.