Luigi Bonavina1, Davide Bona, Pierre René Binyom, Alberto Peracchia. 1. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of General Surgery, Istituto Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy. luigi.bonavina@unimi.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for esophageal carcinoma. Over the past decade, laparoscopy has proven an accurate staging modality for detecting peritoneal carcinosis and small metastatic liver deposits unsuspected at preoperative investigation. This has led to a change in surgical strategy in up to 20% of patients. In addition, by means of laparoscopic techniques, it is possible to mobilize the stomach and perform a safe transhiatal mediastinal dissection at least up to the level of the inferior pulmonary veins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Laparoscopy-assisted esophagectomy was attempted in 43 patients over the past 3 years. The esophagectomy was performed via laparoscopy combined with right thoracotomy (group A) or with left cervicotomy and transmediastinal endodissection (group B). RESULTS: The overall conversion rate to laparotomy was 11.6%. No hospital deaths occurred. The morbidity rate was 20% in group A and 30.7% in group B. The mean hospital stay was 11 in group A and 10 days in group B. Five patients died between 11 and 19 months after surgery with recurrent disease. No port-site metastases were recorded during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This approach has proven feasible and safe in the medium-term follow-up. Further experience and a longer follow-up are needed to assess the impact of these procedures on long-term survival.
BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for esophageal carcinoma. Over the past decade, laparoscopy has proven an accurate staging modality for detecting peritoneal carcinosis and small metastatic liver deposits unsuspected at preoperative investigation. This has led to a change in surgical strategy in up to 20% of patients. In addition, by means of laparoscopic techniques, it is possible to mobilize the stomach and perform a safe transhiatal mediastinal dissection at least up to the level of the inferior pulmonary veins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Laparoscopy-assisted esophagectomy was attempted in 43 patients over the past 3 years. The esophagectomy was performed via laparoscopy combined with right thoracotomy (group A) or with left cervicotomy and transmediastinal endodissection (group B). RESULTS: The overall conversion rate to laparotomy was 11.6%. No hospital deaths occurred. The morbidity rate was 20% in group A and 30.7% in group B. The mean hospital stay was 11 in group A and 10 days in group B. Five patients died between 11 and 19 months after surgery with recurrent disease. No port-site metastases were recorded during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This approach has proven feasible and safe in the medium-term follow-up. Further experience and a longer follow-up are needed to assess the impact of these procedures on long-term survival.
Authors: Fernando Delgado Gomis; Segundo A Gómez Abril; Manuel Martínez Abad; José M Guallar Rovira Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Sebastian F Schoppmann; Gerhard Prager; Felix B Langer; Franz M Riegler; Barbara Kabon; Edith Fleischmann; Johannes Zacherl Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Grant Sanders; Frederic Borie; Emanuel Husson; Pierre Marie Blanc; Gianluca Di Mauro; Christiano Claus; Bertrand Millat Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 4.584