Literature DB >> 18650629

Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy.

Elfriede Bollschweiler1, Jonas Apitzsch, Jonas Apitsch, Rainer Obliers, Armin Koerfer, Stefan P Mönig, Ralf Metzger, Arnulf H Hölscher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The term "informed consent" explains the process by which a patient, before treatment, is provided comprehensive and impartial information regarding a planned operative procedure so that he/she understands the implications of the procedure before consenting. The goal of the current study was to investigate whether standard methods of consenting can be improved using a multimedia-based information program (MM-IP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study, 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy went through the standard informed consent process. One group of patients was also given access to a MM-IP. Questionnaires were completed before surgery. These evaluated how patients perceived their own understanding of important aspects of their illness (ie, disease, therapeutic alternatives, operation, risks) and satisfaction with the consenting process. Patients' anxiety levels were also assessed. These questionnaires were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the MM-IP for improving the consent process.
RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (47 women, 29 men, median age 54 years) were included. There was no significant age or gender variation between the groups (standard n = 41 and MM-IP n = 35). Eighty-two percent of all respondents were satisfied with the standard informed consent process. However, perceived understanding of the material was significantly improved in the MM-IP group (P < 0.001). Patients with less formal education profited particularly from the MM-IP. Preoperative anxiety did not vary between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Use of the multimedia-based program was positively evaluated by patients, and significantly improved patients' perceived understanding of their disease and its treatment. It is, therefore, valuable in the informed consent process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18650629     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318180a3a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

1.  An audit of the knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards Surgical Informed Consent (SIC).

Authors:  Bushra Ashraf; Nasira Tasnim; Muhammad Saaiq; Khaleeq-Uz- Zaman
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-27

2.  Risk factors for litigation following major transectional bile duct injury sustained at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M T P R Perera; M A Silva; A J Shah; R Hardstaff; S R Bramhall; J Issac; J A C Buckels; D F Mirza
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Increased Access to Professional Interpreters in the Hospital Improves Informed Consent for Patients with Limited English Proficiency.

Authors:  Jonathan S Lee; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Steven E Gregorich; Michael H Crawford; Adrienne Green; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Effect of the informed consent process on anxiety and comprehension of patients undergoing esophageal and gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Simonetta Betti; Andrea Sironi; Greta Saino; Cristian Ricci; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of written supplement to verbal communication of results to patients at the time of flexible cystoscopy.

Authors:  Frank D'Arcy; Chew Lin Yip; Kiran Manya; Paul McGivern; Rustom P Manecksha; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A survey of preferences regarding surgical approach to thyroid surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas E Coorough; David F Schneider; Monica Woll Rosen; Rebecca S Sippel; Herbert Chen; Margaret L Schwarze; Haggi Mazeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The effect of a visual aid on the comprehension of cataract surgery in a rural, indigent South Indian population.

Authors:  Abraar M Karan; Daniel J Campbell; Hylton R Mayer
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-23

9.  Impact of a multimedia teaching tool on parental anxiety and knowledge during the informed consent process.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Paton; Sharon K Davis; Nan Gaylord; Xueyuan Cao; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Breast Cancer Surgery Decision-Making and African-American Women.

Authors:  Jane R Schubart; Michelle A Farnan; Rena B Kass
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.