Literature DB >> 11533432

The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.

A J Lloyd1.   

Abstract

The scientific understanding of how people perceive and code risks and then use this information in decision making has progressed greatly in the last 20 years. There is considerable evidence that people employ simplifying heuristics in judgement and decision making. These heuristics may lead to bias in how people interpret information. However, much of our understanding of risk perception is based on laboratory studies. It is much less clear whether risk perception in the real world (as in the case of medical treatments) exhibits the same patterns and biases. This paper reviews the published literature on risk perception in patients who face substantial treatment risks. It examines how accurate patients' perception of risk is, what factors affect the perception of risk, and several possible explanations for why patients' risk perception is not always accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11533432      PMCID: PMC1765734          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.0100014..

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  21 in total

Review 1.  Optimistic biases about personal risks.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process.

Authors:  B Fischhoff
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  Cancer: science and society and the communication of risk.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-28

4.  The role of risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery.

Authors:  A Lloyd; P Hayes; P R Bell; A R Naylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  A comparison of perceived and objective CVD risk in a general population.

Authors:  M Niknian; S M McKinlay; W Rakowski; R A Carleton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters.

Authors:  S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; W C Black; H G Welch
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  How patients' preferences for risk information influence treatment choice in a case of high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty: asymptomatic localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam; M D Mazur
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger?

Authors:  M Gattellari; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; S M Dunn; C A MacLeod
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Diane Valade; Catherine Orlowski; Catherine Draus; Barbara Nabozny-Valerio; Susan Keiser
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  61 in total

1.  Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparable.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Engaging patients in medical decision making.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; J Melnikow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-15

Review 3.  Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

4.  Differences in belief about likely outcomes account for differences in doctors' treatment preferences: but what accounts for the differences in belief?

Authors:  T Rakow
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 5.  Older people's perspectives on fall risk and fall prevention programs: a literature review.

Authors:  Siobhan McMahon; Kristine M Talley; Jean F Wyman
Journal:  Int J Older People Nurs       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.115

Review 6.  Making decisions about benefits and harms of medicines.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Olga Kostopoulou; Clare Harries
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

7.  Economics and health promotion.

Authors:  Luke B Connelly
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-10

8.  Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique.

Authors:  Jennifer Tio; Adam LaCaze; W Neil Cottrell
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-12-23

9.  Doctor, is a CT scan safe for my child?

Authors:  M J Goske
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Patients' perception of the informed consent process for neurooncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Eva Knifed; Nir Lipsman; Warren Mason; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.