Literature DB >> 14530720

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

James D Luketich1, Miguel Alvelo-Rivera, Percival O Buenaventura, Neil A Christie, James S McCaughan, Virginia R Litle, Philip R Schauer, John M Close, Hiran C Fernando.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess our outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Esophagectomy has traditionally been performed by open methods. Results from most series include mortality rates in excess of 5% and hospital stays frequently greater than 10 days. MIE has the potential to improve these results, but only a few small series have been reported. This report summarizes our experience of 222 cases.
METHODS: From 1996 to 2002, MIE was performed in 222 patients. Indications for operation included high-grade dysplasia (n = 47) and cancer (n = 175). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used in 78 (35.1%) and radiation in 36 (16.2%). Initially, a laparoscopic transhiatal approach was used (n = 8), but subsequently our approach evolved to include thoracoscopic mobilization (n = 214).
RESULTS: There were 186 men and 36 women. Median age was 66.5 years (range, 39-89). Nonemergent conversion to open procedure was required in 16 patients (7.2%). MIE was successfully completed in 206 (92.8%) patients. The median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (range, 1-30); hospital stay was 7 days (range, 3-75). Operative mortality was 1.4% (n = 3). Anastomotic leak rate was 11.7% (n = 26). At a mean follow-up of 19 months (range, 1-68), quality of life scores were similar to preoperative values and population norms. Stage specific survival was similar to open series.
CONCLUSIONS: MIE offers results as good as or better than open operation in our center with extensive minimally invasive and open experience. In this single institution experience, we observed a lower mortality rate (1.4%) and shorter hospital stay (7 days) than most open series. Given these results, we are now developing an intergroup trial (ECOG 2202) to assess MIE in a multicenter setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530720      PMCID: PMC1360107          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000089858.40725.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  28 in total

1.  Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  S G Swisher; L Deford; K W Merriman; G L Walsh; R Smythe; A Vaporicyan; J A Ajani; T Brown; R Komaki; J A Roth; J B Putnam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  The vascularization of a gastric tube as a substitute for the esophagus is affected by its diameter.

Authors:  J P Pierie; P W de Graaf; T J van Vroonhoven; H Obertop
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Oesophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; A R Parenti; A Ruol; M Costantini; S Merigliano; E Ancona
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; J M Weerts; C Jehaes; S Markiewicz; R Lombard
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic staging for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  M J Krasna; X Jiao
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-07

6.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagomyotomy.

Authors:  J D Luketich; H C Fernando; N A Christie; P O Buenaventura; R J Keenan; S Ikramuddin; P R Schauer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

8.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  J D Luketich; P R Schauer; N A Christie; T L Weigel; S Raja; H C Fernando; R J Keenan; N T Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Blazeby; J R Farndon; J Donovan; D Alderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia.

Authors:  J D Luketich; N T Nguyen; P R Schauer
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  272 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Arnulf H Hölscher; Jessica Leers; Hans Fuchs; Marc Bludau; Klaus L Prenzel; E Bollschweiler; Wolfgang Schröder
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Juan C Cendan; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Daiko; Mitsuyo Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: focus on current treatment options.

Authors:  Leonidas Lekakos; Nikolaos P Karidis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Christos Tsigris; Gregory Kouraklis; Nikolaos Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Postoperative incidence of incarcerated hiatal hernia and its prevention after robotic transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  John Sutherland; Nilanjana Banerji; Julie Morphew; Eric Johnson; Daniel Dunn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Multidisciplinary approach to oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  F López
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with serious comorbidities.

Authors:  Naohiko Koide; Daisuke Takeuchi; Akira Suzuki; Shinichi Miyagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  One surgeon's learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence?

Authors:  Wei Guo; Ying-Bo Zou; Zheng Ma; Hui-Jun Niu; Yao-Guang Jiang; Yun-Ping Zhao; Tai-Qian Gong; Ru-Wen Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.