Literature DB >> 25621911

Do revision total hip augments provide appropriate modularity?

Matthew G Teeter1, Douglas D R Naudie1, James L Howard1, Richard W McCalden1, Steven J MacDonald1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Porous metal acetabular augments have become widely used to fill bony defects in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to determine whether the currently offered size range of the augments is appropriate for surgical needs.
METHODS: We reviewed the cases of all patients at 1 centre with a porous revision shell, and when an augment was used we recorded the patient and implant characteristics.
RESULTS: We reviewed the cases of 281 patients, and augments were used in 24. Augment diameter was skewed toward the small end (p < 0.001), although thickness was not (p = 0.05); 21 of 24 augments were those with the smallest 3 diameters and thicknesses.
CONCLUSION: Given the sizes used, the full range of inventory provided by the manufacturer may be unnecessary, as surgeons will likely attempt a larger shell before a larger augment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25621911      PMCID: PMC4309765          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.005514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  14 in total

1.  The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J V Patel; J L Masonis; R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do.

Authors:  Wayne G Paprosky; Scott S Sporer; Brian P Murphy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.

Authors:  Jonah Hebert Davies; G Yves Laflamme; Josee Delisle; Julio Fernandes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.

Authors:  Daniel J Del Gaizo; Vamsi Kancherla; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Effect of femoral head size on polyethylene wear and synovitis after total hip arthroplasty: a sonographic and radiographic study of 39 patients.

Authors:  Sarunas Tarasevicius; Otto Robertsson; Uldis Kesteris; Romas Jonas Kalesinskas; Hans Wingstrand
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Siegmeth; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Winston Y Kim; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review.

Authors:  M Abolghasemian; S Tangsataporn; A Sternheim; D Backstein; O Safir; A E Gross
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss.

Authors:  W Steven Borland; Raj Bhattacharya; James P Holland; Nigel T Brewster
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting.

Authors:  Lawrence E Murr; Sara M Gaytan; Edwin Martinez; Frank Medina; Ryan B Wicker
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.