Literature DB >> 21480750

Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.

Yi Ting Huang1, Peter C Gordon.   

Abstract

How does prior context influence lexical and discourse-level processing during real-time language comprehension? Experiment 1 examined whether the referential ambiguity introduced by a repeated, anaphoric expression had an immediate or delayed effect on lexical and discourse processing, using an eye-tracking-while-reading task. Eye movements indicated facilitated recognition of repeated expressions, suggesting that prior context can rapidly influence lexical processing. However, context effects at the discourse level affected later processing, appearing in longer regression-path durations 2 words after the anaphor and in greater rereading times of the antecedent expression. Experiments 2 and 3 explored the nature of this delay by examining the role of the preceding context in activating relevant representations. Offline and online interpretations confirmed that relevant referents were activated following the critical context. Nevertheless, their initial unavailability during comprehension suggests a robust temporal division between lexical and discourse-level processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480750      PMCID: PMC3130803          DOI: 10.1037/a0023218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  37 in total

1.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect.

Authors:  Jos J A van Berkum; Pienie Zwitserlood; Peter Hagoort; Colin M Brown
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-10

2.  Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort; Lea Hald; Marcel Bastiaansen; Karl Magnus Petersson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Lau; Clare Stroud; Silke Plesch; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Ruth Filik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-23

6.  Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

8.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Children's and adults' processing of anomaly and implausibility during reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Holly S S L Joseph; Simon P Liversedge; Hazel I Blythe; Sarah J White; Susan E Gathercole; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  3 in total

1.  Distinguishing lexical- versus discourse-level processing using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Joseph Hopfinger; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

2.  Some inferences still take time: Prosody, predictability, and the speed of scalar implicatures.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Processing coordinate structures in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Chen Qingrong; Huang Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.