Literature DB >> 18976987

Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface.

Yi Ting Huang1, Jesse Snedeker.   

Abstract

Scalar implicature has served as a test case for exploring the relations between semantic and pragmatic processes during language comprehension. Most studies have used reaction time methods and the results have been variable. In these studies, we use the visual-world paradigm to investigate implicature. We recorded participants' eye movements during commands like "Point to the girl that has some of the socks" in the presence of a display in which one girl had two of four socks and another had three of three soccer balls. These utterances contained an initial period of ambiguity in which the semantics of some was compatible with both characters. This ambiguity could be immediately resolved by a pragmatic implicature which would restrict some to a proper subset. Instead in Experiments 1 and 2, we found that participants were substantially delayed, suggesting a lag between semantic and pragmatic processing. In Experiment 3, we examined interpretations of some when competitors were inconsistent with the semantics (girl with socks vs. girl with no socks). We found quick resolution of the target, suggesting that previous delays were specifically linked to pragmatic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18976987     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  38 in total

1.  Distinguishing lexical- versus discourse-level processing using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Joseph Hopfinger; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

2.  Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Processing scalar implicature: a constraint-based approach.

Authors:  Judith Degen; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 4.  Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models.

Authors:  Shevaun Lewis; Colin Phillips
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-02

5.  Spared bottom-up but impaired top-down interactive effects during naturalistic language processing in schizophrenia: evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

Authors:  Hugh Rabagliati; Nathaniel Delaney-Busch; Jesse Snedeker; Gina Kuperberg
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  When some is not every: dissociating scalar implicature generation and mismatch.

Authors:  Einat Shetreet; Gennaro Chierchia; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Is it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.

Authors:  Chigusa Kurumada; Meredith Brown; Sarah Bibyk; Daniel F Pontillo; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-08-14

8.  Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The Role of Non-Actuality Implicatures in Processing Elided Constituents.

Authors:  Margaret Grant; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  The Neural Computation of Scalar Implicature.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne; Jesse Snedeker; Stephanie Yen-Mun Liem Azar; Albert E Kim
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.