Literature DB >> 15910130

Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Jos J A Van Berkum1, Colin M Brown, Pienie Zwitserlood, Valesca Kooijman, Peter Hagoort.   

Abstract

The authors examined whether people can use their knowledge of the wider discourse rapidly enough to anticipate specific upcoming words as a sentence is unfolding. In an event-related brain potential (ERP) experiment, subjects heard Dutch stories that supported the prediction of a specific noun. To probe whether this noun was anticipated at a preceding indefinite article, stories were continued with a gender-marked adjective whose suffix mismatched the upcoming noun's syntactic gender. Prediction-inconsistent adjectives elicited a differential ERP effect, which disappeared in a no-discourse control experiment. Furthermore, in self-paced reading, prediction-inconsistent adjectives slowed readers down before the noun. These findings suggest that people can indeed predict upcoming words in fluent discourse and, moreover, that these predicted words can immediately begin to participate in incremental parsing operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15910130     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  152 in total

1.  Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.

Authors:  Kazunaga Matsuki; Tracy Chow; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Christoph Scheepers; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; David M Groppe; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

4.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas; Rina Schul
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

6.  Cross-modal prediction in speech depends on prior linguistic experience.

Authors:  Carolina Sánchez-García; James T Enns; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

8.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Elin Runnqvist; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of conceptual processing in healthy adults and patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tatiana Sitnikova; Christopher Perrone; Donald Goff; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.