Literature DB >> 21464737

Clinical longer-term results after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate (PHILOS).

Michael Tobias Hirschmann1, Basil Fallegger, Felix Amsler, Pietro Regazzoni, Thomas Gross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the subjective and objective longer-term outcomes after fracture fixation with the Proximal Humerus InterLocking OSteosynthesis (PHILOS) plate.
DESIGN: Minimum 4-year follow-up of a primary prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Single university trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four consecutively collected patients fulfilled the study criteria. Seven patients (11%) were lost to follow-up, resulting in 57 patients (65 ± 14 years). INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation with the PHILOS® plate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Standardized follow-up including functional outcome instruments (eg, Constant Murley score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), rate of complications, and secondary surgeries at 6, 12, and no less than 48 months (uni- and multivariate analysis; P < 0.05).
RESULTS: At the 4- to 6-year follow-up (median 5 years postinjury), patients on average achieved an 87% range of motion of the injured compared with the uninjured shoulder (eg, 133° ± 40° versus 152° ± 26° abduction). Objective and subjective outcome improved significantly during the overall follow-up, most of all in reoperated and younger patients (65 years and younger) and within the first postinjury year. We observed an overall reoperation rate of 29% and 10 patients (17.5%) demonstrated an insufficient result resulting from pain (greater than 3 visual analog scale) or restricted abduction (less than 90°) at longer-term follow-up. First, the need for revision surgery and, second, increasing age were found to be the most predictive factors for unsatisfactory results.
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture fixation with the PHILOS showed good to excellent longer-term results in three fourths of patients with outcome partially still improving after the first postoperative year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464737     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f2b20e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  37 in total

1.  Surgical Technique for Open Reduction-Internal Fixation of an Unstable Displaced 3-Part Proximal Humeral Fracture Using a Proximal Humeral Locking Plate.

Authors:  Wichan Kanchanatawan; Sunikom Suppauksorn; Thanapon Chobpenthai; Worawit Densiri-Aksorn; Warongporn Pongpinyopap; Gem Dorjiee
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-06-19

2.  The Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracture Using Internal Fixation with Fixed-angle Plates.

Authors:  Patrick Ziegler; Sven Maier; Ulrich Stöckle; Markus Gühring; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Cadaveric study of the anatomical reference points for proximal humeral plate positioning.

Authors:  Kittikun Thienthong; Manusak Boonard; Artit Boonrod; Kowit Chaisiwamongkol; Suwitcha Sripadungkul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-24

4.  Is Arthroscopic Technique Superior to Open Reduction Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Isolated Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fractures?

Authors:  Weixiong Liao; Hao Zhang; Zhongli Li; Ji Li
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Postoperative Evaluation of Reduction Loss in Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Comparison of Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Xiao-Yang Jia; Yan-Xi Chen; Min-Fei Qiang; Kun Zhang; Hao-Bo Li; Yu-Chen Jiang; Yi-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Comparison of CFR-PEEK and conventional titanium locking plates for proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective controlled study of patient outcomes.

Authors:  A Padolino; G Porcellini; B Guollo; E Fabbri; G N Kiran Kumar; P Paladini; G Merolla
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

7.  Treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures: comparison of interlocking plate fixation versus minimal invasive techniques.

Authors:  Felix Bachelier; Antonius Pizanis; Julia Schwitalla; Tim Pohlemann; Dieter Kohn; Reiner Wirbel
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-01

8.  Early locking plate removal following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures could prevent secondary implant-related complications.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Soeren Waldmann; Alexander Antoniadis; Martin Liebhauser; Naeder Helmy; Ulf Riede
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-06-05

9.  Establishing the appropriate position of proximal humerus locking plates: a cadaveric study of five plating systems and their anatomic reference measurements.

Authors:  Matthew A Butler; Aakash Chauhan; Gregory A Merrell; Jeffrey A Greenberg
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-05-23

10.  Why locking plates for the proximal humerus do not fit well.

Authors:  Hyungsuk Kim; Yang-Guk Chung; Ji Seok Jang; Yongdeok Kim; Soo Bin Park; Hyun Seok Song
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.