Literature DB >> 23728442

Treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures: comparison of interlocking plate fixation versus minimal invasive techniques.

Felix Bachelier1, Antonius Pizanis, Julia Schwitalla, Tim Pohlemann, Dieter Kohn, Reiner Wirbel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The functional results and the complications following interlocking plate fixation of displaced proximal humerus fractures should be evaluated and compared with those following minimal invasive fixation techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (30 women, 20 men, mean age 62.7 (18-91) years) were treated for a displaced proximal humerus fracture using an interlocking plate fixation (PHILOS®) between 2003 and 2004. The mean follow-up time was 12 (9-36) months. Functional and radiographic results (Constant-Murley and Neer scores) were analyzed and compared with an equivalent historical control group of 53 patients operated for the same fracture types using minimal invasive techniques (K-wires and/or cannulated screws) between 1995 and 1997. According to the OTA/AO classification, there were 15 type A, 18 type B, and 17 type C fractures in the plate fixation group, and 23, 25, and 5 of these types in the control group, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean Neer score was 85.9, the mean Constant-Murley score 84, whereas 82.4 and 75.4 for the control group, respectively. Good and excellent results were seen in 78%, whereas in 70% in the control group. The results were dependent upon the fracture's type, sex, and patient's age. Complications were seen in 9 patients, whereas in 16 patients in the control group.
INTERPRETATION: Using an interlocking plate, the indication of fixation of displaced proximal humerus fractures had been expanded to type C fractures. The implant failure rate can be reduced. The functional results achieved are better compared with those following minimal invasive techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23728442     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1235-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  26 in total

1.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate. Presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures].

Authors:  M Kettler; P Biberthaler; V Braunstein; C Zeiler; M Kroetz; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Path analysis of factors for functional outcome at one year in 463 proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Norbert P Südkamp; Laurent Audigé; Simon Lambert; Ralph Hertel; Gerhard Konrad
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  [Proximal humerus fracture: is fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis superior to conservative treatment?].

Authors:  C Krettek; U Wiebking
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Benefits and harms of locking plate osteosynthesis in intraarticular (OTA Type C) fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen; Lars Henrik Frich; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Locked plating of proximal humeral fractures: is function affected by age, time, and fracture patterns?

Authors:  Clifford B Jones; Debra L Sietsema; Daniel K Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Minimal osteosynthesis of fractures of the head of the humerus. Indications, technic, results].

Authors:  G Siebler; H Walz; E H Kuner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Crispin C Ong; Michael Walsh; Laith M Jazrawi; Nirmal C Tejwani; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Thanasas; George Kontakis; Antonios Angoules; David Limb; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected].

Authors:  Kevin C Owsley; John T Gorczyca
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

1.  The treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures: analysis of the results of 55 cases treated with PHILOS plate.

Authors:  D Fattoretto; A Borgo; C Iacobellis
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-01

2.  Minimal invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) through deltoid-pectoralis approach for the treatment of elderly proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Li Zhao; Peng Yang; Lei Zhu; Ai-Min Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Venkat Kavuri; Blake Bowden; Neil Kumar; Doug Cerynik
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?

Authors:  Hyojune Kim; Myung Jin Shin; Erica Kholinne; Janghyeon Seo; Duckwoo Ahn; Ji Wan Kim; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.