Literature DB >> 21464487

The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement: high early failure rate.

C P Charalambous1, Z Abiddin, S P Mills, S Rogers, P Sutton, R Parkinson.   

Abstract

The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement consists of a trochlear component and a modular patellar component which has a metal-backed mobile polyethylene bearing. We present the early results of the use of this prosthesis for established isolated patellofemoral arthritis in 51 consecutive patellofemoral replacements in 35 patients. The mean follow-up was 25 months (5 to 60). The estimated survival rate at three years was 63% (95% confidence interval 47 to 80) with revision as the endpoint and 46% (95% confidence interval 30 to 63) with revision and ongoing moderate or severe pain as the endpoint. The early results of the use of the low contact stress patellofemoral replacement are disappointing with a high rate of revision. We cannot therefore recommend its use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464487     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  11 in total

Review 1.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?

Authors:  Sébastien Lustig; Robert A Magnussen; Diane L Dahm; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the FPV patellofemoral replacement.

Authors:  A P Monk; B H van Duren; H Pandit; D Shakespeare; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: Current concepts.

Authors:  Rory Cuthbert; Saket Tibrewal; Sheo B Tibrewal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-22

4.  [Operative therapy of isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Biomechanics as a guide].

Authors:  F Dirisamer; C Anderl; M Liebensteiner; J Hochreiter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months.

Authors:  Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Gebhart Meidinger; Philip B Schöttle; Matthias Cotic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key.

Authors:  David Dejour; Mo Saffarini; Yves Malemo; Marco Pungitore; Jeremy Valluy; Luca Nover; Guillaume Demey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sabrina M Strickland; Mackenzie L Bird; Alexander B Christ
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  J P van der List; H Chawla; H A Zuiderbaan; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Matthias Cotic; Knut Beitzel; Julia F Baldini; Gebhart Meidinger; Philip B Schöttle; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Gabriele Pisanu; Federica Rosso; Corrado Bertolo; Federico Dettoni; Davide Blonna; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.