Literature DB >> 24310926

Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months.

Andreas B Imhoff1, Matthias J Feucht, Gebhart Meidinger, Philip B Schöttle, Matthias Cotic.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and sports-related outcomes at 24 months after isolated and combined patellofemoral inlay resurfacing (PFIR).
METHODS: Between 2009 and 2010, 29 consecutive patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) were treated with the HemiCAP(®) Wave Patellofemoral Resurfacing System (Arthrosurface, Franklin, MA, USA). Based on preoperative findings, patients were divided into two groups: group I, isolated PFIR (n = 20); and group II, combined PFIR with concomitant procedures to address patellofemoral instability, patellofemoral malalignment, and tibiofemoral malalignment (n = 9). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes included WOMAC, subjective IKDC, Pain VAS, Tegner activity score, and a self-designed sports questionnaire. Kellgren-Lawrence grading was used to assess progression of tibiofemoral OA. The Caton-Deschamps Index was used to assess differences in patellar height.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (93 %) were available for 24-month follow-up. Eighty-one per cent of the patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the overall outcome. Significant improvements in the WOMAC, subjective IKDC, and Pain VAS were seen in the overall patient cohort and in both subgroups. The median Tegner score and sports frequency showed a significant increase in the overall patient cohort and in group II. The number of sports disciplines increased significantly in both subgroups. No significant progression of tibiofemoral OA or changes in patellar height were observed.
CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral inlay resurfacing is an effective and safe procedure in patients with symptomatic patellofemoral OA. Significant improvements in functional scores and sports activity were found after both isolated and combined procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24310926     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2786-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  60 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wayne B Leadbetter; Thorsten M Seyler; Phillip S Ragland; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Alternatives to patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  John P Fulkerson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Prospective clinical and radiological two-year results after patellofemoral arthroplasty using an implant with an asymmetric trochlea design.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Philip B Schöttle; Matthias Cotic; Vyas Dharmesh; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review.

Authors:  A M Smith; W R C Peckett; P A Butler-Manuel; K M Venu; J C d'Arcy
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Wayne B Leadbetter; Frank R Kolisek; Richard L Levitt; Andrew F Brooker; Patrick Zietz; David R Marker; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  [Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases].

Authors:  J Caton; G Deschamps; P Chambat; J L Lerat; H Dejour
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1982

10.  Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: A matched case-control study of 13 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Dirk M Werkman; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [Patellofemoral arthroplasty: indication, technique and results].

Authors:  M Cotic; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Hannes Degenhardt; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of localized cartilage defects of the femoral condyles: a systematic review of clinical studies.

Authors:  Andreas Fuchs; Helge Eberbach; Kaywan Izadpanah; Gerrit Bode; Norbert P Südkamp; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Patellofemoral arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Cotic; P Forkel; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Treatment of full-thickness femoral cartilage lesions using condyle resurfacing prosthesis.

Authors:  Jens Ole Laursen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Biplanar supracondylar femoral derotation osteotomy for patellofemoral malalignment: the anterior closed-wedge technique.

Authors:  Stefan Hinterwimmer; Philipp Minzlaff; Tim Saier; Philipp Niemeyer; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Matthias Cotic; Knut Beitzel; Julia F Baldini; Gebhart Meidinger; Philip B Schöttle; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  High mid-term revision rate after treatment of large, full-thickness cartilage lesions and OA in the patellofemoral joint using a large inlay resurfacing prosthesis: HemiCAP-Wave®.

Authors:  Jens Ole Laursen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian Godshaw; Nicholas Kolodychuk; Gerard K Williams; Benjamin Browning; Deryk Jones
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2018

10.  Treatment of Unicompartmental Cartilage Defects of the Knee with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Patellofemoral Partial Knee Arthroplasty or Focal Resurfacing.

Authors:  Bernhard Springer; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.