Literature DB >> 30721343

Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key.

David Dejour1, Mo Saffarini2, Yves Malemo1, Marco Pungitore1, Jeremy Valluy3, Luca Nover3, Guillaume Demey1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report outcomes of a recent anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) system at > 3 years. The hypothesis was that its functional scores and revision rates would be at least equivalent to those reported for other 'trochlear-cutting' implants in the literature.
METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients that had received PFA using the same anatomic trochlear-cutting implant (KneeTech PFJ, Corin-Tornier, Montbonnot, France) with a dome-shaped patellar button and had systematic lateral facetectomy without lateral release were enrolled. Radiographic parameters collected pre-operatively included: trochlear dysplasia type and patellar height, TT-TG, patellar tilt and shape. Clinical scores collected pre-operatively and at > 3 years included: Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Society Score (KSS).
RESULTS: The initial cohort comprised 23 women (82%) and five men (18%), aged 63.3 ± 14.7 years, of which 23 had trochlear dysplasia (82%). One patient (4%) could not be reached, and three (11%) were revised to TKA due to arthritic progression, aged 77, 80 and 83 years at index operation, only one of which had trochlear dysplasia (type A). At final follow-up, none of the remaining 24 patients had complications; their OKS was 35.0 ± 10.3 and KSS symptoms and function were 19.8 ± 5.0 and 71.7 ± 13.6.
CONCLUSION: The anatomic trochlear-cutting PFA granted satisfactory scores and prevented mechanical complications, but the high incidence of early revisions, all due to spread of arthritis hence to improper patient selection. PFA should be restricted to patients with trochlear dysplasia, in whom arthritis was triggered by patellar instability and maltracking rather than degenerative or age-related diseases. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PFA; Patellofemoral arthritis; Patellofemoral arthroplasty; Patient selection; Trochlear dysplasia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30721343     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05368-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  Postoperative patellar tilt in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K C Chan; G S Gill
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Arthritis progression after patellofemoral joint replacement.

Authors:  Steve G Nicol; Jeremy M Loveridge; A E Weale; C E Ackroyd; J H Newman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement: high early failure rate.

Authors:  C P Charalambous; Z Abiddin; S P Mills; S Rogers; P Sutton; R Parkinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-04

Review 4.  Imaging in patellofemoral instability: an abnormality-based approach.

Authors:  Paulo Renato Fernandes Saggin; Jose Idílio Saggin; David Dejour
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Complications after patello-femoral versus total knee replacement in the treatment of isolated patello-femoral osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  C J Dy; N Franco; Y Ma; M Mazumdar; M M McCarthy; A Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: 7-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Aaron J Johnson; Qais Naziri; Frank R Kolisek; Wayne B Leadbetter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Diane L Dahm; Walid Al-Rayashi; Khaled Dajani; Jay P Shah; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2010-10

8.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Wayne B Leadbetter; Frank R Kolisek; Richard L Levitt; Andrew F Brooker; Patrick Zietz; David R Marker; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  The Warwick patellofemoral arthroplasty trial: a randomised clinical trial of total knee arthroplasty versus patellofemoral arthroplasty in patients with severe arthritis of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Michelle Odumenya; Katie McGuinness; Juul Achten; Nick Parsons; Tim Spalding; Matthew Costa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

1.  Treatment of Unicompartmental Cartilage Defects of the Knee with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Patellofemoral Partial Knee Arthroplasty or Focal Resurfacing.

Authors:  Bernhard Springer; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27

2.  Preoperative patellofemoral anatomy affects failure rate after isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Patricia M Lutz; Conrad Ketzer; Marco C Rupp; Matthias Cotic; Andreas B Imhoff; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.