Literature DB >> 22009560

In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the FPV patellofemoral replacement.

A P Monk1, B H van Duren, H Pandit, D Shakespeare, D W Murray, H S Gill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Isolated symptomatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis has been reported in 2% of men and 8% of women older than the age of 55 years in the community. With the development of improved designs and surgical techniques, interest in the use of patellofemoral replacement has increased. The primary aim of the newer generation of patellofemoral replacement implant designs has been to more closely reproduce normal knee kinematics. This study compares the functional sagittal plane in vivo kinematics of a contemporary patellofemoral prosthesis, the FPV, with normal knee kinematics using the patella tendon angle and patella flexion angle relationships with the knee flexion angle.
METHODS: The in vivo kinematics for a group of 8 patients (15 knees) with patellofemoral replacement and 22 normal subjects was measured for both a step-up and a lunge exercise using an established fluoroscopic method.
RESULTS: The patella tendon angle characteristics of the implanted knees were similar to those of the normal knees for the step-up exercise with a significant difference only observed at 50° knee flexion angle. For the lunge exercise, the patella tendon angle for the implanted knee was consistently lower than that measured for the normal knee. Overall the subjects had excellent clinical scores post-patellofemoral replacement showing a significant improvement from their pre-operative scores.
CONCLUSION: The kinematics of the FPV implant was closer to normal than those of total knee implants; however, there were still differences from the normal knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22009560     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1717-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  Biarticulating two-dimensional computer model of the human patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  H S Gill; J J O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Making sense of knee arthroplasty kinematics: news you can use.

Authors:  Scott A Banks; M K Harman; J Bellemans; W A Hodge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Jonathan L Rees; David J Beard; Richie H s Gill; Christopher A f Dodd; David M Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher E Ackroyd; B Chir
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Hollinghurst; James Stoney; Thomas Ward; Hemant Pandit; David Beard; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Advancement of the tibial tuberosity.

Authors:  P Maquet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Spongialization: a new treatment for diseased patellae.

Authors:  R P Ficat; C Ficat; P Gedeon; J B Toussaint
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [Patellofemoral arthroplasty--results of a nation-wide survey in Germany and review of the literature].

Authors:  C Becher; A Renke; T J Heyse; M Schofer; C O Tibesku; S Fuchs-Winkelmann
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 0.923

9.  Midterm clinical results of the Autocentric II patellofemoral prosthesis.

Authors:  J M F van Wagenberg; B Speigner; T Gosens; J de Waal Malefijt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The effects of femoral fixed body coordinate system definition on knee kinematic description.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Lenz; Amitkumar Mane; Lorin P Maletsky; Nicholas A Morton
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  [Patellofemoral arthroplasty: indication, technique and results].

Authors:  M Cotic; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Patellofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion after total knee replacement: a computational simulation.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Kun-Jhih Lin; Ting-Kuo Chang; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty influences tibiofemoral kinematics: the effect of patellar thickness.

Authors:  Hilde Vandenneucker; Luc Labey; Jan Victor; Jos Vander Sloten; Kaat Desloovere; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty reproduces natural patellofemoral joint kinematics when the patella is resurfaced.

Authors:  Hilde Vandenneucker; Luc Labey; Jos Vander Sloten; Kaat Desloovere; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Hannes Degenhardt; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Constraints in posterior-stabilised TKA kinematics: a comparison of two generations of an implant.

Authors:  Hemant Pandit; Bernard Hendrik van Duren; M Price; S Tilley; Harinderjit Singh Gill; Neil P Thomas; David W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Operative therapy of isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Biomechanics as a guide].

Authors:  F Dirisamer; C Anderl; M Liebensteiner; J Hochreiter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months.

Authors:  Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Gebhart Meidinger; Philip B Schöttle; Matthias Cotic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  J P van der List; H Chawla; H A Zuiderbaan; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  The Present Situation of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in the Management of Solitary Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.