Literature DB >> 22407183

Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?

Sébastien Lustig1, Robert A Magnussen, Diane L Dahm, David Parker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patellofemoral arthroplasty remains controversial, primarily due to the high failure rates reported with early implants. Numerous case series have been published over the years detailing results of various first- and second-generation implants. The purpose of this work is to summarize results published to date and identify common themes regarding implants, surgical techniques, and indications in order to maximize results of future procedures.
METHODS: A comprehensive review of the MEDLINE database was carried out to identify all clinical studies related to patellofemoral arthroplasty.
RESULTS: First-generation resurfacing implants were associated with relatively high failure rates in the medium term. Second-generation implants, with femoral cuts based on TKA designs have yielded more promising medium-term results. Surgical indications are specific and must be carefully followed to minimize poor results. Short-term complications are generally related to patellar maltracking, while long-term complications are generally related to progression of osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral joint. Implant loosening and polyethylene wear are rarely reported. Short-term results are favourable for new technology including custom implants and computer navigated surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, recent improvements in implant design and surgical techniques have resulted in improvements in short- and medium-term results. More work is required to assess the long-term outcomes of modern implant designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22407183     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1948-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  64 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of patellofemoral joint prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew A Amis; Wongwit Senavongse; Peter Darcy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wayne B Leadbetter; Thorsten M Seyler; Phillip S Ragland; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A modular prosthesis for patellofemoral arthroplasty: design and initial results.

Authors:  Alan C Merchant
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty. 2-12-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P Cartier; J L Sanouiller; R Grelsamer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons, and design considerations.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Feller; R J Bartlett; D M Lang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

7.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A 2- to 18-year followup study.

Authors:  J B Krajca-Radcliffe; T P Coker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review.

Authors:  A M Smith; W R C Peckett; P A Butler-Manuel; K M Venu; J C d'Arcy
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Wayne B Leadbetter; Frank R Kolisek; Richard L Levitt; Andrew F Brooker; Patrick Zietz; David R Marker; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: A matched case-control study of 13 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Dirk M Werkman; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  23 in total

1.  The forgotten joint.

Authors:  Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bi-unicompartmental and combined uni plus patellofemoral replacement: indications and surgical technique.

Authors:  Sergio Romagnoli; Matteo Marullo; Michele Massaro; Enis Rustemi; Federico D'Amario; Michele Corbella
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08

Review 3.  [Patellofemoral arthroplasty: indication, technique and results].

Authors:  M Cotic; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  What Is the Risk of Repeat Revision When Patellofemoral Replacement Is Revised to TKA? An Analysis of 482 Cases From a Large National Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Stephen E Graves; Alana Cuthbert; David Parker; Peter Myers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty influences tibiofemoral kinematics: the effect of patellar thickness.

Authors:  Hilde Vandenneucker; Luc Labey; Jan Victor; Jos Vander Sloten; Kaat Desloovere; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty reproduces natural patellofemoral joint kinematics when the patella is resurfaced.

Authors:  Hilde Vandenneucker; Luc Labey; Jos Vander Sloten; Kaat Desloovere; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  [Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Hannes Degenhardt; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty of the patellofemoral and medial compartments.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Andrew Price
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Norberto Confalonieri; Alessio Biazzo; Pietro Cerveri; Chris Pullen; Alfonso Manzotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The need for secondary resurfacing is affected by trochlear height in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lucas Werth; Mo Saffarini; Felix Amsler; Ashraf Abdelkafy; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.