Literature DB >> 26590562

Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review.

J P van der List1, H Chawla2, H A Zuiderbaan3, A D Pearle2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Historically poor results of survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) have been reported in the setting of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. More recently, however, fairly good results of PFA were reported, but the current status of PFA outcomes is unknown. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to assess overall PFA survivorship and functional outcomes.
METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane systems, and the registries were searched. Twenty-three cohort studies and one registry reported survivorship using Kaplan-Meier curve, while 51 cohort studies reported functional outcomes of PFA.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were level II studies, while 45 studies were level III or IV studies. Heterogeneity was mainly seen in type of prosthesis and year the cohort started. Nine hundred revisions in 9619 PFAs were reported yielding 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-year PFA survivorships of 91.7, 83.3, 74.9 and 66.6 %, respectively, and an annual revision rate of 2.18. Functional outcomes were reported in 2587 PFAs with an overall score of 82.2 % of the maximum score. KSS and Knee Function Score were 87.5 and 81.6 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed that fairly good results of PFA survivorship and functional outcomes were reported at short- and midterm follow-up in the setting of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Heterogeneity existed mainly in prosthesis design and year the cohort started. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results provide a clear overview of the current status of PFA in the setting of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcomes; Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis; PFA; Patellofemoral arthroplasty; Survivorship

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26590562     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3878-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  100 in total

Review 1.  Long-term results of compartmental arthroplasties of the knee: Long term results of partial knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Parratte; M Ollivier; A Lunebourg; M P Abdel; J-N Argenson
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  The use of isolated patellar prostheses in Sweden 1977-1986.

Authors:  A H Arnbjörnsson; L Ryd
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Resurfacing of the patella in young patients.

Authors:  R V Worrell
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Prosthetic replacement of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  R D Scott
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Short-term outcomes of robotically assisted patello-femoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ugur Turktas; Ahmet Piskin; Gary G Poehling
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Partial knee arthroplasty: patellofemoral arthroplasty and combined unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty implants--general considerations and indications, technique and clinical experience.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Stefano M P Rossi; Matteo Ghiara
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A preliminary report of patellofemoral arthroplasty in isolated patellofemoral arthritis.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Zheng-Jian Xu; Rong-Xin He; Shi-Gui Yan; Li-Dong Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: a multicenter study.

Authors:  In Jun Koh; Woo-Shin Cho; Nam Yong Choi; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: A matched case-control study of 13 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Dirk M Werkman; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Quality of outcome data in knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christof Pabinger; David Benjamin Lumenta; Daniel Cupak; Andrea Berghold; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  16 in total

1.  What Is the Risk of Repeat Revision When Patellofemoral Replacement Is Revised to TKA? An Analysis of 482 Cases From a Large National Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Stephen E Graves; Alana Cuthbert; David Parker; Peter Myers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Norberto Confalonieri; Alessio Biazzo; Pietro Cerveri; Chris Pullen; Alfonso Manzotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Arthroscopic Patellar Lateral Facetectomy.

Authors:  Marcio B Ferrari; George Sanchez; Jorge Chahla; Gilbert Moatshe; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-03-20

6.  Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key.

Authors:  David Dejour; Mo Saffarini; Yves Malemo; Marco Pungitore; Jeremy Valluy; Luca Nover; Guillaume Demey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sabrina M Strickland; Mackenzie L Bird; Alexander B Christ
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

8.  No bias for developer publications and no difference between first-generation trochlear-resurfacing versus trochlear-cutting implants in 15,306 cases of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Birgit Reihs; Florian Reihs; Gerold Labek; Markus Hochegger; Andreas Leithner; Nikolaus Böhler; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Short-term Revision Risk of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is High: An Analysis from Eight Large Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Francois Tudor; Michelle Lorimer; John McKie; Eric Bohm; Otto Robertsson; Keijo T Makela; Jaason Haapakoski; Ove Furnes; Christoffer Bartz-Johannessen; Rob G H H Nelissen; Liza N Van Steenbergen; Donald C Fithian; Heather A Prentice
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georg Hauer; Gerwin A Bernhardt; Gloria Hohenberger; Lukas Leitner; Paul Ruckenstuhl; Andreas Leithner; Gerald Gruber; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.