Literature DB >> 25497522

Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Trevor Brothers1, Tamara Y Swaab1, Matthew J Traxler2.   

Abstract

Readers may use contextual information to anticipate and pre-activate specific lexical items during reading. However, prior studies have not clearly dissociated the effects of accurate lexical prediction from other forms of contextual facilitation such as plausibility or semantic priming. In this study, we measured electrophysiological responses to predicted and unpredicted target words in passages providing varying levels of contextual support. This method was used to isolate the neural effects of prediction from other potential contextual influences on lexical processing. While both prediction and discourse context influenced ERP amplitudes within the time range of the N400, the effects of prediction occurred much more rapidly, preceding contextual facilitation by approximately 100 ms. In addition, a frontal, post-N400 positivity (PNP) was modulated by both prediction accuracy and the overall plausibility of the preceding passage. These results suggest a unique temporal primacy for prediction in facilitating lexical access. They also suggest that the frontal PNP may index the costs of revising discourse representations following an incorrect lexical prediction.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Event-related potentials; N250; N400; Prediction; Sentence processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25497522      PMCID: PMC4308503          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  39 in total

1.  Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing.

Authors:  Douglas Roland; Hongoak Yun; Jean-Pierre Koenig; Gail Mauner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-12-23

Review 2.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words.

Authors:  C Van Petten; M Kutas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-01

4.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Both sides get the point: hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Heinke Mai; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

6.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

Review 8.  Beyond the sentence given.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort; Jos van Berkum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.

Authors:  K A Paller; M Kutas; A R Mayes
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10

10.  A discourse on semantic priming.

Authors:  D J Foss
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  32 in total

1.  Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Nyssa Z Bulkes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  Examining the Role of General Cognitive Skills in Language Processing: A Window into Complex Cognition.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Suzanne R Jongman; Jakub M Szewczyk
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-11-16

3.  Executive functions and components of oral reading fluency through the lens of text complexity.

Authors:  Tin Q Nguyen; Sage E Pickren; Neena M Saha; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2020-02-11

4.  A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Trevor Brothers; Edward W Wlotko
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials.

Authors:  Mante S Nieuwland; Dale J Barr; Federica Bartolozzi; Simon Busch-Moreno; Emily Darley; David I Donaldson; Heather J Ferguson; Xiao Fu; Evelien Heyselaar; Falk Huettig; E Matthew Husband; Aine Ito; Nina Kazanina; Vita Kogan; Zdenko Kohút; Eugenia Kulakova; Diane Mézière; Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Guillaume Rousselet; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer; Katrien Segaert; Jyrki Tuomainen; Sarah Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  1/f neural noise and electrophysiological indices of contextual prediction in aging.

Authors:  S Dave; T A Brothers; T Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Authors:  Megan Zirnstein; Janet G van Hell; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20

9.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Hemispheric differences and similarities in comprehending more and less predictable sentences.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.