Literature DB >> 27000127

Scoring System for the Management of Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: Cost Analysis of a Prospective Study.

Jake G Prigoff1, Gary W Swain1, Celia M Divino2,3.   

Abstract

Predicting the presence of a persistent common bile duct (CBD) stone is a difficult and expensive task. The aim of this study is to determine if a previously described protocol-based scoring system is a cost-effective strategy. The protocol includes all patients with gallstone pancreatitis and stratifies them based on laboratory values and imaging to high, medium, and low likelihood of persistent stones. The patient's stratification then dictates the next course of management. A decision analytic model was developed to compare the costs for patients who followed the protocol versus those that did not. Clinical data model inputs were obtained from a prospective study conducted at The Mount Sinai Medical Center to validate the protocol from Oct 2009 to May 2013. The study included all patients presenting with gallstone pancreatitis regardless of disease severity. Seventy-three patients followed the proposed protocol and 32 did not. The protocol group cost an average of $14,962/patient and the non-protocol group cost $17,138/patient for procedural costs. Mean length of stay for protocol and non-protocol patients was 5.6 and 7.7 days, respectively. The proposed protocol is a cost-effective way to determine the course for patients with gallstone pancreatitis, reducing total procedural costs over 12 %.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary pancreatitis; ERCP; Gallstone pancreatitis; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; MRCP

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000127     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3078-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  38 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.

Authors:  M R Arguedas; A W Dupont; C M Wilcox
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Prediction of common bile duct stones in the earliest stages of acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  H C van Santvoort; O J Bakker; M G Besselink; T L Bollen; K Fischer; V B Nieuwenhuijs; H G Gooszen; K J Erpecum
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective study on the incidence of cholangitis and clinical predictors of retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  L Chang; S K Lo; B E Stabile; R J Lewis; C de Virgilio
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Chi-Liang Cheng; Stuart Sherman; James L Watkins; Jeffrey Barnett; Martin Freeman; Joseph Geenen; Michael Ryan; Harrison Parker; James T Frakes; Evan L Fogel; William B Silverman; Kulwinder S Dua; Giuseppe Aliperti; Paul Yakshe; Michael Uzer; Whitney Jones; John Goff; Laura Lazzell-Pannell; Abdullah Rashdan; M'hamed Temkit; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Mark D Duncan; John W Harmon; Paul D Freeswick; Jeffrey S Bender; Mark Bohlman; Thomas H Magnuson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Acute pancreatitis: a lethal disease of increasing incidence.

Authors:  A P Corfield; M J Cooper; R C Williamson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Frossard; Michael L Steer; Catherine M Pastor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.