Literature DB >> 22366491

Variation in the use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Kristin M Sheffield1, Yimei Han, Yong-Fang Kuo, Courtney M Townsend, James S Goodwin, Taylor S Riall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in prevention of common bile duct (CBD) injuries and the management of CBD stones is controversial, and current variation in use of IOC has not been well described. STUDY
DESIGN: Multilevel hierarchical models using data from the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use data files (2001 to 2008) were used to evaluate the percentage of variance in the use of IOC that was attributable to patient, surgeon, and hospital factors.
RESULTS: A total of 176,981 cholecystectomies were performed in 212 hospitals in Texas. There was wide variation in IOC use, ranging from 2.4% to 98.4% of cases among surgeons and 3.7% to 94.8% of cases among hospitals, even after adjusting for case mix differences. The percentage of variance in IOC use attributable to the surgeon was 20.7% and an additional 25.7% was attributable to the hospital. IOC use was associated with increased age, gallstone pancreatitis or CBD stones, Hispanic race, decreased illness severity, insurance, and later year of cholecystectomy. ERCP (24.0% vs 14.9%, p < 0.0001) and CBD exploration (1.63% vs 0.42%, p < 0.0001) were more commonly performed in patients undergoing IOC.
CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty regarding the benefit of IOC leads to wide variation in use across surgeons and hospitals. The surgeon and hospital are more important determinants of IOC use than measured patient characteristics. Our study highlights the need for further evaluation of comparative effectiveness of IOC in the prevention of CBD injuries and retained stones, taking into account patient risk factors, surgeon skill, cost, and availability of local expertise.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22366491      PMCID: PMC3319194          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  38 in total

1.  Is intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost effective?

Authors:  Y D Podnos; D V Gelfand; T S Dulkanchainun; S E Wilson; S Cao; P Ji; J A Ortiz; D K Imagawa
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Quantifying the physician contribution to managed care pharmacy expenses: a random effects approach.

Authors:  Mark E Cowen; Robert L Strawderman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David R Flum; Christopher Flowers; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine?

Authors:  Matthew S Metcalfe; Thao Ong; Martin H Bruening; Harish Iswariah; Simon A Wemyss-Holden; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a complement to cholangiography for the detection of choledocholithiasis at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Catheline; R Turner; J Paries
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David R Flum; E Patchen Dellinger; Allen Cheadle; Leighton Chan; Thomas Koepsell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Mostafa A Hamad; Ahmad A Nada; Mohamad Y Abdel-Atty; Ahmad S Kawashti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Are patients suffering from stable angina receiving optimal medical treatment?

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; R Blais; A Jacques; R N Battista; R Lebeau; J Brophy
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2001-06

10.  Laparoscopic intracorporeal ultrasound versus fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiography: after the learning curve.

Authors:  V J Halpin; D Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  17 in total

1.  Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael R Cox; Joel P O Budge; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of intraoperative cholangiography on postoperative morbidity and readmission: analysis of the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Hamzeh M Halawani; Hani Tamim; Farah Khalifeh; Aurélie Mailhac; Faek R Jamali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The impact of intraoperative cholangiography on recurrent pancreatitis and biliary complications in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Mark J Walsh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones.

Authors:  George Berci; John Hunter; Leon Morgenstern; Maurice Arregui; Michael Brunt; Brandon Carroll; Michael Edye; David Fermelia; George Ferzli; Frederick Greene; Joseph Petelin; Edward Phillips; Jeffrey Ponsky; Harry Sax; Steven Schwaitzberg; Nathaniel Soper; Lee Swanstrom; William Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Cost analysis and effectiveness comparing the routine use of intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography with fluoroscopic cholangiogram in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Fernando D Dip; Domenech Asbun; Armando Rosales-Velderrain; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Conrad H Simpfendorfer; Samuel Szomstein; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Routine ultrasound and blood tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-are they worthwhile? A diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Julius Pochhammer; Gunnar Blumenstock; Michael Schäffer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a combined (one-step) procedure: a random comparison to the standard (two-step) procedure.

Authors:  Maris Jones; Matthew Johnson; Edward Samourjian; Karen Schlauch; Karen Slauch; Nathan Ozobia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Routine use of fluorescent incisionless cholangiography as a new imaging modality during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Fernando Dip; Mayank Roy; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Conrad Simpfendorfer; Samuel Szomstein; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Evidence-based current surgical practice: calculous gallbladder disease.

Authors:  Casey B Duncan; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  A new fluorescence imaging technique for visualizing hepatobiliary structures using sodium fluorescein: result of a preclinical study in a rat model.

Authors:  Sam-Youl Yoon; Chang Min Lee; Tae-Jin Song; Hyung Joon Han; Seonghan Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.