Literature DB >> 16329083

Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

M Johansson1, A Thune, L Nelvin, L Lundell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed as a day-care procedure for many years. Few studies have been conducted with primary focus on patient acceptance and preferences in terms of quality of life for this practice compared with overnight stay.
METHODS: Data from 100 patients with symptomatic gallstones randomized to laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed either as a day-care procedure or with overnight stay were analysed. Complications, admissions and readmissions, quality of life and health economic aspects were assessed. Two instruments were used to assess quality of life, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB).
RESULTS: Forty-eight (92 per cent) of 52 patients in day-care group were discharged 4-8 h after the operation. Forty-two (88 per cent) of 48 in the overnight group went home on the first day after surgery. The overall conversion rate was 2 per cent. Two patients had complications after surgery, both in the day-care group. No patient in either group was readmitted. There was no significant difference in total quality of life score between the two groups. The mean direct medical cost per patient in the day-care group (3085 Euros) was lower than that in the overnight group (3394 Euros).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed as a day-case procedure with a low rate of complications and admissions/readmissions. Patient acceptance in terms of quality of life variables is similar to that for cholecystectomy with an overnight stay. The day-care strategy is associated with a reduction in cost. Copyright 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16329083     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  38 in total

1.  Does endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography have a negative effect on laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Murat Çakır; Tevfik Küçükkartallar; Ahmet Tekin; Mehmet Aykut Yıldırım; Adil Kartal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-04-09

2.  Day-care laparoscopic cholecystectomy with diathermy hook versus fundus-first ultrasonic dissection: a randomized study.

Authors:  Anne Mattila; Johanna Mrena; Hannu Kautiainen; Juha Nevantaus; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Gallstones.

Authors:  Grant Sanders; Andrew N Kingsnorth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-11

Review 4.  Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction.

Authors:  Daniel Ansari; Luca Gianotti; Jörg Schröder; Roland Andersson
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Improved outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection: a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Yucel Cengiz; Jan Dalenbäck; Gunnar Edlund; Leif A Israelsson; Arthur Jänes; Mats Möller; Anders Thorell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An audit of day case vs overnight surgery at a community hospital in Japan.

Authors:  Atsushi Sato; Yukio Terashita; Yoichiro Mori; Tomotaka Okubo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-27

8.  Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.

Authors:  Jun Nakajima; Akira Sasaki; Toru Obuchi; Shigeaki Baba; Hiroyuki Nitta; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  Safety and effectiveness of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital: a prospective study of 110 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Athanasios Marinis; Emmanouil Stamatakis; Athanasia Tsaroucha; Nikolaos Dafnios; Georgios Anastasopoulos; Georgios Polymeneas; Theodosios Theodosopoulos
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.