Literature DB >> 21431385

Copper filtration in pediatric digital X-ray imaging: its impact on image quality and dose.

Philippe Brosi1, Anja Stuessi, Francis R Verdun, Peter Vock, Rainer Wolf.   

Abstract

The effect of copper (Cu) filtration on image quality and dose in different digital X-ray systems was investigated. Two computed radiography systems and one digital radiography detector were used. Three different polymethylmethacrylate blocks simulated the pediatric body. The effect of Cu filters of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm thickness on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the corresponding effective doses (EDs) were measured at tube voltages of 60, 66, and 73 kV. Image quality was evaluated in a contrast-detail phantom with an automated analyzer software. Cu filters of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm thickness decreased the ESD by 25-32%, 32-39%, and 40-44%, respectively, the ranges depending on the respective tube voltages. There was no consistent decline in image quality due to increasing Cu filtration. The estimated ED of anterior-posterior (AP) chest projections was reduced by up to 23%. No relevant reduction in the ED was noted in AP radiographs of the abdomen and pelvis or in posterior-anterior radiographs of the chest. Cu filtration reduces the ESD, but generally does not reduce the effective dose. Cu filters can help protect radiosensitive superficial organs, such as the mammary glands in AP chest projections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21431385     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-011-0115-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  16 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector.

Authors:  W P Hosch; C Fink; B Radeleff; A kampschulte a; G W Kauffmann; J Hansmann
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.

Authors:  P Monnin; Z Holzer; R Wolf; U Neitzel; P Vock; F Gudinchet; F R Verdun
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Christof H Weber; Stefan Wirth; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian F Reiser; Marcus Treitl
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography.

Authors:  K Koedooder; H W Venema
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The influence of tube filtration and potential on patient dose during x-ray examinations.

Authors:  P C Shrimpton; D G Jones; B F Wall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration.

Authors:  R A Nicholson; A Thornton; M Akpan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.

Authors:  R Aufrichtig; P Xue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.

Authors:  Okka W Hamer; Markus Völk; Zorger Zorger; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; Kris Bonnarens; An De Hauwere; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  8 in total

1.  Feasibility of ultra-low radiation dose digital subtraction angiography: Preliminary study in a simplified cerebral angiography phantom.

Authors:  Jun Young Maeng; Yunsun Song; Yu Sub Sung; Tae-Il Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Tae-Hyung Kim
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Optimization of image quality and patient dose in radiographs of paediatric extremities using direct digital radiography.

Authors:  A Jones; C Ansell; C Jerrom; I D Honey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Organ doses and lifetime attributable risk evaluations for scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients with the EOS imaging system.

Authors:  Marco Branchini; Antonella Del Vecchio; Carmen Rosaria Gigliotti; Alessandro Loria; Alberto Zerbi; Riccardo Calandrino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?

Authors:  Jenna Ruth Tugwell-Allsup; Rhys Wyn Morris; Kate Thomas; Richard Hibbs; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Dual-energy computed tomography using a gantry-based preclinical cone-beam microcomputed tomography scanner.

Authors:  Justin J Tse; Joy Dunmore-Buyze; Maria Drangova; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-08-21

Review 6.  A paediatric X-ray exposure chart.

Authors:  Stephen P Knight
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-06-09

7.  Radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality in digital chest radiography by new spatial noise reduction algorithm.

Authors:  Wonje Lee; Seungho Lee; Semin Chong; Kyungmin Lee; Jongha Lee; Jae Chol Choi; Changwon Lim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of the use of various imaging units and projections on the radiation dose received by children during chest digital radiography.

Authors:  Hongrong Xu; Kaiping Huang; Bo Liu; Jinhua Cai; Huan Zheng; Helin Zheng; Qiurui Yang; Changhong Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.