Literature DB >> 34797726

Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?

Jenna Ruth Tugwell-Allsup1, Rhys Wyn Morris2, Kate Thomas1, Richard Hibbs3, Andrew England4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Copper filtration removes lower energy X-ray photons, which do not enhance image quality but would otherwise contribute to patient radiation dose. This study explores the use of additional copper filtration for neonatal mobile chest imaging.
METHODS: A controlled factorial-designed experiment was used to determine the effect of independent variables on image quality and radiation dose. These variables included: copper filtration (0 Cu, 0.1 Cu and 0.2 Cu), exposure factors, source-to-image distance and image receptor position (direct / tray). Image quality was evaluated using absolute visual grading analysis (VGA) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and entrance surface dose (ESD) was derived using an ionising chamber within the central X-ray beam.
RESULTS: VGA, CNR and ESD significantly reduced (p < 0.01) when using added copper filtration. For 0.1 Cu, the percentage reduction was much greater for ESD (60%) than for VGA (14%) and CNR (20%), respectively. When compared to the optimal combinations of parameters for incubator imaging using no copper filtration, an increase in kV and mAs when using 0.1-mm Cu resulted in better image quality at the same radiation dose (direct) or, equal image quality at reduced dose (in-tray). The use of 0.1-mm Cu for neonatal chest imaging with a corresponding increase in kV and mAs is therefore recommended.
CONCLUSION: Using additional copper filtration significantly reduces radiation dose (at increased mAs) without a detrimental effect on image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first study, using an anthropomorphic phantom, to explore the use of additional Cu for digital radiography neonatal chest imaging and therefore helps inform practice to standardise and optimise this imaging examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34797726      PMCID: PMC8822573          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  20 in total

1.  Imaging the neonate in the incubator: an investigation of the technical, radiological and nursing issues.

Authors:  S J Mutch; S D P Wentworth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Paediatric x-ray radiation dose reduction and image quality analysis.

Authors:  L Martin; R Ruddlesden; C Makepeace; L Robinson; T Mistry; H Starritt
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.394

Review 3.  Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose.

Authors:  Martin Uffmann; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Neonatal chest radiography: Influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom.

Authors:  S Al-Murshedi; A England
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-10

6.  Nonselective Filters Offer Important Dose-Reducing Potential in Radiological Examination of the Paediatric Pelvis.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Butler; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Sci       Date:  2009-03-09

7.  Effect of comfort pads and incubator design on neonatal radiography.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; Michael Baad; Ingrid Reiser; Kate A Feinstein; Zhengfeng Lu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-09-03

8.  Modification of chest radiography exposure parameters using a neonatal chest phantom.

Authors:  Stefan B Schäfer; Sabine Papst; Martin Fiebich; Claudia Rudolph; Jan de Laffolie; Gabriele A Krombach
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-04

9.  Impact of body part thickness on AP pelvis radiographic image quality and effective dose.

Authors:  K Alzyoud; P Hogg; B Snaith; K Flintham; A England
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-03

Review 10.  A paediatric X-ray exposure chart.

Authors:  Stephen P Knight
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.