Literature DB >> 27908027

Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Karen S Helfer1, Gabrielle R Merchant1, Richard L Freyman1.   

Abstract

Similarity between target and competing speech messages plays a large role in how easy or difficult it is to understand messages of interest. Much research on informational masking has used highly aligned target and masking utterances that are very similar semantically and syntactically. However, listeners rarely encounter situations in real life where they must understand one sentence in the presence of another (or more than one) highly aligned, syntactically similar competing sentence(s). The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of syntactic/semantic similarity of target and masking speech in different spatial conditions among younger, middle-aged, and older adults. The results of this experiment indicate that differences in speech recognition between older and younger participants were largest when the masker surrounded the target and was more similar to the target, especially at more adverse signal-to-noise ratios. Differences among listeners and the effect of similarity were much less robust, and all listeners were relatively resistant to masking, when maskers were located on one side of the target message. The present results suggest that previous studies using highly aligned stimuli may have overestimated age-related speech recognition problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27908027      PMCID: PMC5392104          DOI: 10.1121/1.4967297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  52 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.

Authors:  William S Woods; Sridhar Kalluri; Shareka Pentony; Nazanin Nooraei
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A sub-process view of working memory capacity: evidence from effects of speech on prose memory.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jessica K Ljungberg; Robert Ljung
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-02-24

5.  Effects of masker type, sentence context, and listener age on speech recognition performance in 1-back listening tasks.

Authors:  Jaclyn Schurman; Douglas Brungart; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of syntax in maintaining the integrity of streams of speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Nazanin Nooraei; Sridhar Kalluri; Brent Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners.

Authors:  J Peissig; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon; Louise Hickson; Mark Seeto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Binaural temporal fine structure sensitivity, cognitive function, and spatial speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners (L).

Authors:  Tobias Neher; Thomas Lunner; Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Early aging and postural control while listening and responding.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob J Banks; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A New Speech-in-Noise Test for Measuring Informational Masking in Speech Perception Among Elderly Listeners.

Authors:  Marzieh Amiri; Farnoush Jarollahi; Shohreh Jalaie; Seyyed Jalal Sameni
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-21

3.  Lexical Influences on Errors in Masked Speech Perception in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  Age-Related Changes in Objective and Subjective Speech Perception in Complex Listening Environments.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Peter A Wasiuk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Objective and Subjective Benefit of Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices in Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sara K Mamo; Michael Clauss; Lincoln Dunn
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 7.  Hearing and speech processing in midlife.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Impact of depression on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Christopher G Beevers; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Speech Understanding in Modulated Noise and Speech Maskers as a Function of Cognitive Status in Older Adults.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  Postural Control While Listening in Younger and Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob Banks
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.