Literature DB >> 21411275

Innovation of a reinforcer preference assessment with the difficult to test.

Muriel D Saunders1, Richard R Saunders.   

Abstract

In this study, we continued evaluation of a two-choice preference assessment aimed at identifying a hierarchy of reinforcers for individuals with only one voluntary motor sequence-closing and releasing an adaptive switch. We assessed preferences among types of sensory stimulation in 6 adults with multiple profound impairments using concurrent synchronous reinforcement contingencies. Pre-experimental assessments with various types of stimulation led to the selection of music (A), vibration (B), and either olfactory or visual stimulation (C) as the 3 modalities for continued testing. Each participant received opportunities for familiarization with each type of stimulation in blocks of six 20-min sessions in which the closure of an adaptive switch produced the stimulation for as long as the switch remained closed. Next, participants could choose between pairs of types of stimulation in blocks of 12 sessions. In the first 6 of the 12 sessions, switch closure activated one type (e.g., A) and switch release activated the contrasted type (e.g., B). In the second 6 sessions, the contingencies were reversed. Two additional 12-session blocks completed all possible contrasts (AB, BC and AC). Four of the 6 participants showed distinct preferences in these two-choice tests with indications of preference hierarchies. The results demonstrate a method for obtaining indications of relative preference for potentially reinforcing stimuli from individuals without communication and without the abilities to act on more than one switch.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21411275      PMCID: PMC3733226          DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  12 in total

1.  The development of visual attention in infancy.

Authors:  J Colombo
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.

Authors:  S Lohrmann-O'Rourke; D M Browder
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1998-09

4.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

5.  Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.

Authors:  J Dattilo
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1986

6.  Synchronous reinforcement of vocal responses in failure-to-thrive infants.

Authors:  C T Ramey; L Hieger; D Klisz
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1972-12

7.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

8.  A novel method for testing learning and preferences in people with minimal motor movement.

Authors:  Muriel D Saunders; Richard R Saunders; Akalu Mulugeta; Karen Henderson; Terri Kedziorski; Bob Hekker; Shan Wilson
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2005 May-Jun

9.  SENSITIVITY OF PASSIVE APPROACH DURING PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER ASSESSMENTS FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND MINIMAL MOVEMENT.

Authors:  Sara Spevack; C T Yu; May S Lee; Garry L Martin
Journal:  Behav Interv       Date:  2006-07

10.  Evidence of contingency awareness in people with profound multiple impairments: response duration versus response rate indicators.

Authors:  Muriel D Saunders; Geralyn R Timler; Timothy B Cullinan; Shirley Pilkey; Kent A Questad; Richard R Saunders
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug
View more
  1 in total

1.  Eye-tracking-based experimental paradigm to assess social-emotional abilities in young individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.

Authors:  Thalia Cavadini; Yannick Courbois; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.