Literature DB >> 21398181

Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy.

Jennifer Readings1, Lucy Blake, Polly Casey, Vasanti Jadva, Susan Golombok.   

Abstract

This study examined families where children lack a genetic and/or gestational link with their parents. A total of 101 families (36 donor insemination families, 32 egg donation families and 33 surrogacy families) were interviewed when the child was aged 7 years. Despite a shift in professional attitudes towards openness, about half of the children conceived by egg donation and nearly three-quarters of those conceived by donor insemination remained unaware that the person they know as their mother or father is not, in fact, their genetic parent. By contrast, almost all the surrogacy parents had told their child how they were born. A majority of parents who planned never to tell their child about their conception had told at least one other person. However, qualitative data indicated that to categorize families as 'secret' or 'open' is inadequate. In fact many parents engage in 'layers' of disclosure about their child's conception, both with their child and with family and friends.
Copyright © 2011 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21398181      PMCID: PMC3155651          DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  36 in total

1.  Secrecy and openness in donor insemination.

Authors:  Ken R Daniels; Karyn Taylor
Journal:  Politics Life Sci       Date:  1993-08

2.  Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couples.

Authors:  Fiona MacCallum; Emma Lycett; Clare Murray; Vasanti Jadva; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  To tell or not to tell--what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination.

Authors:  F Lindblad; C Gottlieb; O Lalos
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.949

4.  The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK.

Authors:  O van den Akker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy.

Authors:  A J Turner; A Coyle
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?

Authors:  A McWhinnie
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence.

Authors:  S Golombok; A Brewaeys; M T Giavazzi; D Guerra; F MacCallum; J Rust
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  To tell or not to tell: the decision-making process of egg-donation parents.

Authors:  Clare Murray; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.767

9.  Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents' perspective 13-18 years later.

Authors:  J E Scheib; M Riordan; S Rubin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Families created through surrogacy arrangements: parent-child relationships in the 1st year of life.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Clare Murray; Vasanti Jadva; Fiona MacCallum; Emma Lycett
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2004-05
View more
  31 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of recipients' views and experiences of intra-family egg donation.

Authors:  V Jadva; P Casey; J Readings; L Blake; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

3.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Authors:  Natacha Salomé Lima
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Accuracy of self-reported survey data on assisted reproductive technology treatment parameters and reproductive history.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Alexander C McLain; Germaine M Buck Louis; Barbara Luke; Edwina H Yeung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Laura Mellish; Alex Marks; Vasanti Jadva
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-04

6.  Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Kirby Adlam; Alana D Steffen; Martha Driessnack; Harold D Grotevant; Susan C Klock; Lauri Pasch; Valerie Gruss
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2022-07-31

7.  Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: a follow-up over 10 years.

Authors:  L Blake; V Jadva; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Psychological adjustment in adolescents conceived by assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Cristiana Ilioi; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello
Journal:  Laws       Date:  2015-09

10.  The ethical challenges of the clinical introduction of mitochondrial replacement techniques.

Authors:  John B Appleby
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.