Literature DB >> 11331622

Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?

A McWhinnie1.   

Abstract

This paper presents the case for a change from the current practice of anonymity and secrecy in the use of donated gametes in medically assisted conception. It does so by describing history of the practice, various committees of enquiry over the years, their recommendations for consideration of the children created and the need for follow-up of the outcome; presenting the evidence from outcome studies both about child development and family relationships where secrecy is maintained about the child's origin and those where the practice is openly to acknowledge their origins. This is followed by an analysis of the experience and views of these children once they are adults. In discussion of the composite findings recurring themes emerge. From this it is concluded that offspring from donated gametes should not continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents. In the public debate, four schools of thought are identified. Possible practical scenarios to implement change are discussed. This paper argues that the fundamental issue regarding any of these remains-that priority in decision-making should be the lifelong well-being of the children being created.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11331622     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

1.  Reflections and comments on regulations of biotechnologies that touch the beginning of human life.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The health of children conceived by assisted reproduction technologies.

Authors:  Vic Larcher
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes.

Authors:  Kirstin Mac Dougall; Gay Becker; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Patricia Hershberger; Susan C Klock; Randall B Barnes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy.

Authors:  Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Vasanti Jadva; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 7.  Open-Identity Sperm Donation: How Does Offering Donor-Identifying Information Relate to Donor-Conceived Offspring's Wishes and Needs?

Authors:  An Ravelingien; Veerle Provoost; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?

Authors:  Inez Raes; An Ravelingien; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.352

9.  Attitudes toward oocyte donation among medical and nursing students and couples who have recently become parents: A Swedish study.

Authors:  Gunilla Sydsjö; Sofia Nevander; Sara Norman; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-07

10.  Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?

Authors:  Damian H Adams
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 1.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.