Literature DB >> 29234993

Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Natacha Salomé Lima1,2.   

Abstract

In the last few decades, assisted reproduction has introduced new challenges to the way people conceive and build their families. While the numbers of donor-conceived (DC) individuals have increased worldwide, there are still many controversies concerning access to donor information. Is there a fundamental moral right to know one's genetic background? What does identity in DC families mean? Is there any relationship between identity formation and disclosure of genetic origins? These questions are addressed by analysing core regulatory discourse (ethical recommendations and codes of practice). This analysis shows that the notion of narrative identity is suitable for defining and answering these questions. This review analyses the meaning of resemblance in DC families and the way donors are selected following affinity-ties and discusses disclosure strategies and agreements. As a preliminary conclusion, it could be said that, in the field of third-party reproduction, knowing about the donor conception significantly contributes towards the development of a narrative identity and also serves as a moral basis for the child's right to know.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anonymity–non-anonymity; Assisted reproduction; Disclosure; Donor-conceived individuals; Narrative identity; Right to know

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29234993     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9823-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  31 in total

1.  Biomedicalizing kinship: sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties.

Authors:  Laura Mamo
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2005-09

2.  The dilemma of revealing sensitive information on paternity status in Arabian social and cultural contexts: telling the truth about paternity in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdallah A Adlan; Henk A M J ten Have
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

4.  Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes.

Authors:  Kirstin Mac Dougall; Gay Becker; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  The 'double track' policy for donor anonymity.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development.

Authors:  A Brewaeys
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.949

7.  Resemblance talk: a challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US.

Authors:  Gay Becker; Anneliese Butler; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Open-Identity Sperm Donation: How Does Offering Donor-Identifying Information Relate to Donor-Conceived Offspring's Wishes and Needs?

Authors:  An Ravelingien; Veerle Provoost; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 1.352

9.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  The disclosure decision: concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination.

Authors:  R D Nachtigall; G Becker; S S Quiroga; J M Tschann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Power of Knowledge, Responses to Change, and the Gymnastics of Causation.

Authors:  Michael A Ashby; Bronwen Morrell
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 2.  Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Iñigo de Miguel Beriain
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.