Literature DB >> 11870145

The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence.

S Golombok1, A Brewaeys, M T Giavazzi, D Guerra, F MacCallum, J Rust.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Findings are presented of the second phase of a European longitudinal study of families created by assisted reproduction. The present investigation reports on data obtained during the child's transition to adolescence.
METHODS: A total of 102 IVF families, 94 donor insemination (DI) families, 102 adoptive families, and 102 families with a naturally conceived child were compared on standardized interview and questionnaire measures of parenting and children's psychological well-being.
RESULTS: The assisted reproduction families were similar to the adoptive and natural conception families for many of the measures of the quality of parent-child relationships. To the extent that differences were found between the assisted reproduction families and the other family types, these reflected mainly more positive functioning among the assisted reproduction families, with the possible exception of the overinvolvement with their children of a small proportion of assisted reproduction mothers and fathers. The assisted reproduction children were functioning well and did not differ from the adoptive or naturally conceived children on any of the measures of psychological adjustment. However, only 8.6% had been told about their genetic origins.
CONCLUSIONS: IVF and DI families with an early adolescent child appear to be functioning well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870145     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.3.830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  25 in total

1. 

Authors:  P Borry; R Devries
Journal:  Tijdschr Gezondh Ethiek       Date:  2008

2.  The health of children conceived by assisted reproduction technologies.

Authors:  Vic Larcher
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

5.  Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes.

Authors:  Kirstin Mac Dougall; Gay Becker; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Assisted reproduction: what factors interfere in the professional's decisions? Are single women an issue?

Authors:  Suzana Záchia; Daniela Knauth; José R Goldim; Juliana R Chachamovich; Eduardo Chachamovich; Ana H Paz; Ricardo Felberbaum; PierGiorgio Crosignani; Basil C Tarlatzis; Eduardo P Passos
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus--genes or intrauterine environment? An embryo transfer paradigm in rats.

Authors:  R Gill-Randall; D Adams; R L Ollerton; M Lewis; J C Alcolado
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  An overview of studies on psychological well-being in children born following assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Qi-tao Zhan; Pei-pei Pan; Xiang-rong Xu; Hang-ying Lou; Yi-yun Lou; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Attitudes towards gamete donation among IVF doctors in the Nordic countries-are they in line with national legislation?

Authors:  Claudia Lampic; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: a follow-up over 10 years.

Authors:  L Blake; V Jadva; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.