Literature DB >> 25240010

Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: a follow-up over 10 years.

L Blake1, V Jadva2, S Golombok2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What is the relationship between parent psychological adjustment, type of gamete donation (donor insemination, egg donation) and parents' disclosure of their use of donated gametes to their children. SUMMARY ANSWER: Disclosure of donor origins to the child was not always associated with optimal levels of psychological adjustment, especially for fathers in donor insemination families. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cross-sectional analyses have found mothers and fathers who conceived a child using donated sperm or eggs to be psychologically well-adjusted, with few differences emerging between parents in gamete donation families and parents in families in which parents conceived naturally. The relationship between mothers' and fathers' psychological well-being, type of gamete donation (donor insemination, egg donation) and parents' disclosure decisions has not yet been examined. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this follow-up study, data were obtained from mothers and fathers in donor insemination and egg donation families at 5 time points; when the children in the families were aged 1, 2, 3, 7 and 10. In the first phase of the study, 50 donor insemination families and 51 egg donation families with a 1-year-old child participated. By age 10, the study included 34 families with a child conceived by donor insemination and 30 families with a child conceived by egg donation, representing 68 and 58% of the original sample, respectively. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Families were recruited through nine fertility clinics in the UK. Standardized questionnaires assessing depression, stress and anxiety were administered to mothers and fathers in donor insemination and egg donation families. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mothers and fathers in both donor insemination and egg donation families were found to be psychologically well-adjusted; for the vast majority of parents' levels of depression, anxiety and parenting stress were found to be within the normal range at all 5 time points. Disclosure of the child's donor origins to the child was not always associated with optimal levels of parental psychological adjustment. For example, disclosure was associated with lower levels of psychological well-being for certain groups in particular (such as fathers in donor insemination families), at certain times (when children are in middle childhood and have a more sophisticated understanding of their donor origins). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Owing to small sample sizes, the value of this study lies not in its generalizability, but in its potential to point future research in new directions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Donor insemination and egg donation families are a heterogeneous group, and future research should endeavour to obtain data from fathers as well as mothers. Support and guidance in terms of disclosure and family functioning might be most beneficial for parents (and especially fathers) in donor insemination families, particularly as the child grows older. The more that is known about the process of disclosure over time, from the perspective of the different members of the family, the better supported parents and their children can be. STUDY FUNDING COMPETING INTERESTS: The project described was supported by grant number RO1HD051621 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disclosure; donor insemination; egg donation; gamete donation; psychological well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240010      PMCID: PMC4191454          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  32 in total

1.  Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation.

Authors:  R L Rosnow; R Rosenthal; D B Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

2.  Development of IVF children.

Authors:  Frank van Balen
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  1998-03

3.  Characterizing interactions between anxious mothers and their children.

Authors:  S E Whaley; A Pinto; M Sigman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-12

4.  Families with children conceived by donor insemination: a follow-up at age twelve.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Fiona MacCallum; Emma Goodman; Michael Rutter
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 May-Jun

5.  Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for men, and comparison of item endorsement with their partners.

Authors:  S Matthey; B Barnett; D J Kavanagh; P Howie
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Parenting behaviors in parents with anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Samuel M Turner; Deborah C Beidel; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Kari Tervo
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2003-05

7.  The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence.

Authors:  S Golombok; A Brewaeys; M T Giavazzi; D Guerra; F MacCallum; J Rust
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy.

Authors:  Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Vasanti Jadva; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Emma Lycett; Fiona MacCallum; Vasanti Jadva; Clare Murray; John Rust; Hossam Abdalla; Julian Jenkins; Raoul Margara
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-09

10.  Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure.

Authors:  Emma Lycett; Ken Daniels; Ruth Curson; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exploring Infertile Couples' Decisions to Disclose Donor Conception to The Future Child.

Authors:  Fatemeh Hadizadeh-Talasaz; Masoumeh Simbar; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-10-12

2.  Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello
Journal:  Laws       Date:  2015-09

3.  Recent developments in genetics and medically-assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications†‡.

Authors:  J C Harper; K Aittomäki; P Borry; M C Cornel; G de Wert; W Dondorp; J Geraedts; L Gianaroli; K Ketterson; I Liebaers; K Lundin; H Mertes; M Morris; G Pennings; K Sermon; C Spits; S Soini; A P A van Montfoort; A Veiga; J R Vermeesch; S Viville; M Macek
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2017-12-04

4.  Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation.

Authors:  Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Carlos Calhaz-Jorge; Eline A F Dancet; Kersti Lundin; Mariana Martins; Kelly Tilleman; Petra Thorn; Nathalie Vermeulen; Lucy Frith
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 5.  Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Iñigo de Miguel Beriain
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Acceptance and Disclosure: Comparing genetic symmetry and genetic asymmetry in heterosexual couples between egg recipients and embryo recipients.

Authors:  R Hertz; M K Nelson
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 7.  Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications.

Authors:  J C Harper; K Aittomäki; P Borry; M C Cornel; G de Wert; W Dondorp; J Geraedts; L Gianaroli; K Ketterson; I Liebaers; K Lundin; H Mertes; M Morris; G Pennings; K Sermon; C Spits; S Soini; A P A van Montfoort; A Veiga; J R Vermeesch; S Viville; M Macek
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Parenting stress and its association with perceived agreement about the disclosure decision in parents following donor conception.

Authors:  Anja J Gebhardt; Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Astrid Indekeu; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.636

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.