Literature DB >> 21835830

A longitudinal study of recipients' views and experiences of intra-family egg donation.

V Jadva1, P Casey, J Readings, L Blake, S Golombok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For the past 10 years, we have been carrying out a longitudinal investigation of egg donation families in the UK; a subsample of recipients in these families had a child by egg donation from a sister or sister-in-law. In response to the current debate over the practice of intra-family donation, together with the general lack of available data on the consequences of donation between family members, we examined recipients' experiences of donation between sisters and sisters-in-law.
METHODS: We analysed data from a subsample of recipient mothers who were taking part in a larger investigation of gamete donation families. Mothers were visited at home and interviewed when their child was aged 1, 3, 7 and 10 years. Data from nine recipient mothers whose egg donor was either their sister or sister-in-law were examined to assess the nature of mothers', fathers' and the child's relationship with the donor, and whether mothers had disclosed the nature of their child's conception to others, including the child.
RESULTS: The majority of recipient mothers reported positive relationships between the donor and members of their family (themselves, their partner and their children). Most mothers were happy with the donor's level of involvement with the child and reported that they and the donor maintained their social roles within the family, i.e. as mother and aunt, respectively. By age 10, two children had been told that they had been conceived using egg donation, both of whom had been told the identity of the donor.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample was small, this study provides the first longitudinal data on the experiences of families created using donated gametes from a family member. Intra-family donation between sisters or sisters-in-law can be a positive experience for recipients during the first 10 years following the child's birth. Studies that are specifically designed to look at donation between family members are needed to better evaluate the practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835830      PMCID: PMC3174034          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  19 in total

1.  All in the family: social processes in ovarian egg donation between sisters.

Authors:  Roberta Lessor
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  1993-06

Review 2.  Family members as gamete donors and surrogates.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  A survey of public attitudes toward oocyte donation between sisters.

Authors:  R Lessor; K Reitz; J Balmaceda; R Asch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Should gamete donation between family members be restricted? The case of a 16-year-old donor.

Authors:  J Pierce; P J Reitemeier; A Jameton; V M Maclin; C J De Jonge
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Intergenerational gamete donation: ethical and societal implications.

Authors:  L A Marshall
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Survey of attitudes regarding the use of siblings for gamete donation.

Authors:  M V Sauer; I A Rodi; M Scrooc; M Bustillo; J E Buster
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy.

Authors:  Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Vasanti Jadva; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Psychological aspects in anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation.

Authors:  E Weil; D Cornet; C Sibony; J Mandelbaum; J Salat-Baroux
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Emma Lycett; Fiona MacCallum; Vasanti Jadva; Clare Murray; John Rust; Hossam Abdalla; Julian Jenkins; Raoul Margara
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-09

10.  Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes.

Authors:  R Cook; S Golombok; A Bish; C Murray
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1995-10
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

2.  Unconventional combinations of prospective parents: ethical challenges faced by IVF providers.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Intrafamilial oocyte donation in classic galactosemia: ethical and societal aspects.

Authors:  M Haskovic; W J Poot; R J T van Golde; S H Benneheij; E Oussoren; G M W R de Wert; A Krumeich; M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  'I'm the only mum she knows': parents' understanding of, and feelings about, identity-release egg donation.

Authors:  J Lysons; S Imrie; V Jadva; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.353

5.  Development of A Questionnaire to Measure Attitude toward Oocyte Donation.

Authors:  Reza Omani Samani; Leila Mounesan; Zahra Ezabadi; Samira Vesali
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.