Literature DB >> 10889224

Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the buzzatii complex (Drosophila repleta group): a maximum-likelihood approach.

F Rodríguez-Trelles1, L Alarcón, A Fontdevila.   

Abstract

The buzzatii complex of the mulleri subgroup (Drosophila repleta group) consists of three clusters of species whose evolutionary relationships are poorly known. We analyzed 2,085 coding nucleotides from the xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH:) gene in the 10 available species of the complex and Drosophila mulleri and Drosophila hydei. We adopted a statistical model-fitting approach within the maximum-likelihood (ML) framework of phylogenetic inference. We first modeled the process of nucleotide substitution using a tree topology which was reasonably accurate. Then we used the most satisfactory description so attained to reconstruct the evolutionary relationships in the buzzatii complex. We found that a minimally realistic description of the substitution process of XDH: should allow six substitution types and different substitution rates for codon positions. Using this description we obtained a strongly supported, fully resolved tree which is congruent with the already-known (yet few) relationships. We also analyzed published data from three mitochondrial cytochrome oxidases (CO I, II, and III). In our analyses, these relatively short DNA sequences failed to discriminate statistically among alternative phylogenies. When the data of these three gene regions are combined with the XDH: sequences, the phylogenetic signal emerging from XDH: becomes reinforced. All four of the gene regions evolve faster in the buzzatii and martensis clusters than in the stalkeri cluster, paralleling the amount of chromosomal evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10889224     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  8 in total

1.  A new Drosophila spliceosomal intron position is common in plants.

Authors:  Rosa Tarrio; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The non-regular orbit: three satellite DNAs in Drosophila martensis (buzzatii complex, repleta group) followed three different evolutionary pathways.

Authors:  Gustavo C S Kuhn; Trude Schwarzacher; John S Heslop-Harrison
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Molecular characterization of two natural hotspots in the Drosophila buzzatii genome induced by transposon insertions.

Authors:  M Cáceres; M Puig; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Molecular population genetics of the alpha-esterase5 gene locus in original and colonized populations of Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling Drosophila koepferae.

Authors:  R V Piccinali; L J Mascord; J S F Barker; J G Oakeshott; E Hasson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila. The martensis cluster revisited.

Authors:  Carlos F Prada; Alejandra Delprat; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Molecular characterization and chromosomal distribution of Galileo, Kepler and Newton, three foldback transposable elements of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex.

Authors:  Ferran Casals; Mario Cáceres; Maura Helena Manfrin; Josefa González; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The role of courtship song in female mate choice in South American Cactophilic Drosophila.

Authors:  Patricia P Iglesias; Esteban Hasson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What does mitogenomics tell us about the evolutionary history of the Drosophila buzzatii cluster (repleta group)?

Authors:  Nicolás Nahuel Moreyra; Julián Mensch; Juan Hurtado; Francisca Almeida; Cecilia Laprida; Esteban Hasson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.