Literature DB >> 21385985

A comparison of three methods of hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Ronald D Miller1, Theresa A Ward, Stephen C Shiboski, Neal H Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin values (Hb) can facilitate decisions regarding perioperative transfusion management. Currently, Hb can be determined invasively by analyzing blood via laboratory Co-Oximetry (tHb) or by point-of-care HemoCue (HCue). Recently, a new noninvasive, continuous spectrophotometric sensor (Masimo SpHb) was introduced into clinical practice. We compared the accuracy of the SpHb and HCue with tHb.
METHODS: Twenty patients, ages 40 to 80 years, were studied. They received general anesthesia and underwent spine surgery in the prone position. All blood samples were obtained from a radial artery catheter. SpHb, tHb, and HCue were determined immediately after induction of anesthesia, but before the start of surgery and approximately every hour thereafter. Primary outcomes were defined on the basis of the following differences between measures: SpHb - tHb or HCue - tHb. All patients had 3 to 5 observations taken on each measure. Differences and absolute differences were analyzed by several techniques to assess accuracy. We also investigated the relationship between observed differences and the following variables: tHb level, duration of surgery, age, weight, and perfusion index.
RESULTS: Data consisted of 78 measurements of SpHb, tHb, and HCue made on the 20 patients. Absolute differences between SpHb and tHb were <1.5 g/dL for 61% of observations, between 1.6 to 2.0 g/dL for 16% and >2.0 g/dL for 22% of the observations. Observed differences displayed significant decreases with time and higher perfusion index values. No systematic relationships were observed with age or weight. Except for 1 value, all of the HCue values were <1.0 g/dL of tHb.
CONCLUSIONS: Although HCue was consistently accurate, our data confirm that SpHb often correlated well with tHb values. Yet our study indicates that SpHb may not be as accurate as clinically necessary in some patients. Improved refinement of continuous, noninvasive technology, such as SpHb, could address important clinical requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385985     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820eecd1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of multiwave pulse total-hemoglobinometer during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Daisuke Toyoda; Rie Yasumura; Mitsue Fukuda; Ryoichi Ochiai; Yoshifumi Kotake
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for preoperative evaluation between adult and pediatric patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yong-Hee Park; Seho Lim; Hyun Kang; Hwa-Yong Shin; Chong Wha Baek; Young Cheol Woo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Effects of indigo carmine intravenous injection on noninvasive and continuous total hemoglobin measurement.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Isosu; Tomohiko Satoh; Rieko Oishi; Tsuyoshi Imaizumi; Takahiro Hakozaki; Shinju Obara; Yukihiro Ikegami; Shin Kurosawa; Masahiro Murakawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood hemoglobin measurement in the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hosein Shabaninejad; Nashmil Ghadimi; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Hossein Hosseinifard; Rasoul Azarfarin; Hasan Abolghasem Gorji
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Validation of continuous and noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by pulse CO-oximetry in Japanese surgical patients.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Isosu; Shinju Obara; Atsuyuki Hosono; Satoshi Ohashi; Yuko Nakano; Tsuyoshi Imaizumi; Midori Mogami; Masahiro Murakawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Factors affecting hemoglobin measurement.

Authors:  Lauren Berkow
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Impact of acute changes in perfusion index and blood pressure on the accuracy of non-invasive continuous hemoglobin concentration measurements during induction of anesthesia.

Authors:  Junichi Saito; Masato Kitayama; Erika Amanai; Kentaro Toyooka; Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  The relative trending accuracy of noninvasive continuous hemoglobin monitoring during hemodialysis in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamada; Minako Saeki; Junko Ito; Kazuhiro Kawada; Aya Higurashi; Hiromi Funakoshi; Kohji Takeda
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  The use of a noninvasive hemoglobin monitor for determining fluid distribution and elimination in pediatric patients undergoing minor surgery.

Authors:  Qingquan Lian; Husong Li; Ruifeng Zeng; Junhui Lang; Wangning Shangguan; Huacheng Liu; Benfu Wang; Peter M Rodhe; Christer H Svensen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Accuracy of carboxyhemoglobin detection by pulse CO-oximetry during hypoxemia.

Authors:  John R Feiner; Mark D Rollins; Jeffrey W Sall; Helge Eilers; Paul Au; Philip E Bickler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.