Literature DB >> 10913883

Optimal L(1)-L(2) primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans.

P Kummer1, T Janssen, P Hulin, W Arnold.   

Abstract

Previous studies described a systematic asymmetry of the level of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission (DP) in the space of the primary tones levels L(1) and L(2) in normal-hearing humans. Optimal primary tone level separations L(1)-L(2), which result in maximum DP levels, were close to L(1)=L(2) at high levels, but continuously increased with decreasing stimulus level towards L(1)>L(2) (Gaskill and Brown, 1990, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 821-839). At these optimal L(1)-L(2), however, not only DP levels in normal hearing were maximal, but also trauma-induced DP reductions. A linear equation that approximates optimal L(1)-L(2) level separations thus was suggested to be optimum for use in clinical applications (Whitehead et al., 1995, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 2359-2377). It was the aim of this study to extend the generality of optimal L(1)-L(2) separations to the typical human test frequency range for f(2) frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz. DPs were measured in 22 normal-hearing human ears at 61 primary tone level combinations, with L(2) between 5 and 65 dB SPL and L(1) between 30 and 70 dB SPL (f(2)/f(1)=1.2). It was found that the systematic dependence of the maximum DP level on the L(1)-L(2) separation is independent on frequency. Optimal L(1)-L(2) level separations may well be approximated by a linear equation L(1)=a L(2)+(1-a) b (after Whitehead et al., 1995) with parameters a=0.4 and b=70 dB SPL at f(2) frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz and L(2) levels between 20 and 65 dB SPL. Below L(2)=20 dB SPL, the optimal L(1) was found to be almost constant. Following previous notions (Gaskill and Brown, 1990), an analysis of basilar membrane response data in experimental animals (after Ruggero and Rich, 1991, Hear. Res. 51, 215-230) is further presented that relates optimal L(1)-L(2) separations to frequency-selective compression of the basilar membrane. Based on the assumption that optimal conditions for the DP generation are equal primary tone responses at the f(2) place, a linear increase of the optimal L(1)-L(2) level separation is graphically demonstrated, similar to our results in human ears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10913883     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00097-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  28 in total

1.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.

Authors:  Abigail R Rogers; Sienna R Burke; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.

Authors:  Sienna R Burke; Abigail R Rogers; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  [Automated hearing threshold estimation in newborns using extrapolated DPOAE input/output functions].

Authors:  T Janssen; A Klein; D D Gehr
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of DPOAE growth functions].

Authors:  T Janssen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [The influence of conductive hearing loss on DPOAE-threshold. The effect of an individually optimized stimulation].

Authors:  P Kummer; E M Schuster; F Rosanowski; U Eysholdt; J Lohscheller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analyses of distortion-product otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Darcia M Dierking; Tiffany A Johnson; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for assessment of intracranial hypertension at extreme altitude?

Authors:  Bernhard Olzowy; Gregor von Gleichenstein; Martin Canis; Klaus Mees
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  [Laser Doppler vibrometric measurements of DPOAE in humans. Eardrum vibrations reflect middle- and inner-ear characteristics].

Authors:  D Turcanu; E Dalhoff; H-P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.