Literature DB >> 8270739

Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults.

D H Keefe1, J C Bulen, K H Arehart, E M Burns.   

Abstract

The ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient were measured in an adult group and in groups of infants of age 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months over frequency range 125-10,700 Hz. The development of the external ear canal and middle ear strongly affect input impedance and reflection coefficient responses, and this development is not yet complete at age 24 months. Contributing factors include growth of the area and length of the ear canal, a resonance in the ear-canal walls of younger infants, and a probable influence of growth of the middle-ear cavities. The middle-ear compliance is lower in infants than adults, and the middle-ear resistance is higher. The power transfer into the middle ear of the infant is much less than into that of the adult. Such differences in power transfer directly influence both behavioral and physiological measurements of hearing. The difficulties of interpretation of neonatal tympanograms are shown to be a consequence of ear-canal wall vibration. Impedance and reflectance measurements in the 2-4-kHz range are recommended as a potentially useful clinical tool for circumventing these difficulties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8270739     DOI: 10.1121/1.407347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  88 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of laser-Doppler vibrometry in conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Ritvik P Mehta; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Knowledge translation in audiology: promoting the clinical application of best evidence.

Authors:  Sheila T Moodie; Anita Kothari; Marlene P Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Linda T Miller; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

3.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  A study of sound transmission in an abstract middle ear using physical and finite element models.

Authors:  Antonio Gonzalez-Herrera; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Development of the auditory system.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

8.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Wideband acoustic immittance in children with Down syndrome: prediction of middle-ear dysfunction, conductive hearing loss and patent PE tubes.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Jareen Meinzen-Derr; Alaaeldin M Elsayed; Julia M Amann; Vairavan Manickam; Denis Fitzpatrick; Sally R Shott
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Denis Fitzpatrick; Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.