Literature DB >> 21361219

Verification of monitor unit calculations for non-IMRT clinical radiotherapy: report of AAPM Task Group 114.

Robin L Stern1, Robert Heaton, Martin W Fraser, S Murty Goddu, Thomas H Kirby, Kwok Leung Lam, Andrea Molineu, Timothy C Zhu.   

Abstract

The requirement of an independent verification of the monitor units (MU) or time calculated to deliver the prescribed dose to a patient has been a mainstay of radiation oncology quality assurance. The need for and value of such a verification was obvious when calculations were performed by hand using look-up tables, and the verification was achieved by a second person independently repeating the calculation. However, in a modern clinic using CT/MR/PET simulation, computerized 3D treatment planning, heterogeneity corrections, and complex calculation algorithms such as convolution/superposition and Monte Carlo, the purpose of and methodology for the MU verification have come into question. In addition, since the verification is often performed using a simpler geometrical model and calculation algorithm than the primary calculation, exact or almost exact agreement between the two can no longer be expected. Guidelines are needed to help the physicist set clinically reasonable action levels for agreement. This report addresses the following charges of the task group: (1) To re-evaluate the purpose and methods of the "independent second check" for monitor unit calculations for non-IMRT radiation treatment in light of the complexities of modern-day treatment planning. (2) To present recommendations on how to perform verification of monitor unit calculations in a modern clinic. (3) To provide recommendations on establishing action levels for agreement between primary calculations and verification, and to provide guidance in addressing discrepancies outside the action levels. These recommendations are to be used as guidelines only and shall not be interpreted as requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361219     DOI: 10.1118/1.3521473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  29 in total

1.  Independent calculation of monitor units for VMAT and SPORT.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Karl Bush; Aiping Ding; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dose calculation accuracies in whole breast radiotherapy treatment planning: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Shogo Hatanaka; Yuki Miyabe; Naoki Tohyama; Yu Kumazaki; Masahiko Kurooka; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Hidenobu Tachibana; Satoshi Kito; Akihisa Wakita; Yuko Ohotomo; Hiroyuki Ikagawa; Satoshi Ishikura; Miwako Nozaki; Yoshikazu Kagami; Masahiro Hiraoka; Teiji Nishio
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-02-03

3.  Independent dose verification for brain stereotactic radiotherapy using different add-on micro multi-leaf collimators.

Authors:  Shiro Nishiyama; Satoru Ishibashi; Ryo Takahashi; Hidenobu Tachibana
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-04-19

4.  Validation of secondary dose calculation system with manufacturer-provided reference beam data using heterogeneous phantoms.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Yuya Nakamura; Yohei Yotsuji
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-01-25

5.  Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71.

Authors:  John P Gibbons; John A Antolak; David S Followill; M Saiful Huq; Eric E Klein; Kwok L Lam; Jatinder R Palta; Donald M Roback; Mark Reid; Faiz M Khan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Clinical Implementation of a Proton Dose Verification System Utilizing a GPU Accelerated Monte Carlo Engine.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; H Wan Chan Tseung; Kurt E Augustine; Martin Bues; Daniel W Mundy; Timothy J Walsh; Michael G Herman; Nadia N Laack
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-12-30

7.  Radiotherapy pre-treatment dose validation: A second verification of monitor units (MU) with a commercial software.

Authors:  Iqbal Al Amri; Ramamoorthy Ravichandran; Somangili Satyamoorthi Sivakumar; Johnson Pichi Binukumar; Chirayathmanjiyil Antony Davis; Zakia Al Rahbi; Khalsa Al Shukeili; Fatima Al Kindi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-10

8.  A simple calculation method for determination of equivalent square field.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Shafiei; Hadi Hasanzadeh; Seyed Ahmad Shafiei
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

9.  The quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for early stage prostate cancer: a technical note.

Authors:  Craig A Elith; Shane E Dempsey; Fred Cao; Afrooz Farshadi; Helen M Warren-Forward
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-10-29

10.  Modulation factors calculated with an EPID-derived MLC fluence model to streamline IMRT/VMAT second checks.

Authors:  Stephen Steciw; Satyapal Rathee; Brad Warkentin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.