Literature DB >> 24593704

Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71.

John P Gibbons1, John A Antolak2, David S Followill3, M Saiful Huq4, Eric E Klein5, Kwok L Lam6, Jatinder R Palta7, Donald M Roback8, Mark Reid9, Faiz M Khan10.   

Abstract

A protocol is presented for the calculation of monitor units (MU) for photon and electron beams, delivered with and without beam modifiers, for constant source-surface distance (SSD) and source-axis distance (SAD) setups. This protocol was written by Task Group 71 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and has been formally approved by the AAPM for clinical use. The protocol defines the nomenclature for the dosimetric quantities used in these calculations, along with instructions for their determination and measurement. Calculations are made using the dose per MU under normalization conditions, D'0, that is determined for each user's photon and electron beams. For electron beams, the depth of normalization is taken to be the depth of maximum dose along the central axis for the same field incident on a water phantom at the same SSD, where D'0 = 1 cGy/MU. For photon beams, this task group recommends that a normalization depth of 10 cm be selected, where an energy-dependent D'0 ≤ 1 cGy/MU is required. This recommendation differs from the more common approach of a normalization depth of dm, with D'0 = 1 cGy/MU, although both systems are acceptable within the current protocol. For photon beams, the formalism includes the use of blocked fields, physical or dynamic wedges, and (static) multileaf collimation. No formalism is provided for intensity modulated radiation therapy calculations, although some general considerations and a review of current calculation techniques are included. For electron beams, the formalism provides for calculations at the standard and extended SSDs using either an effective SSD or an air-gap correction factor. Example tables and problems are included to illustrate the basic concepts within the presented formalism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24593704      PMCID: PMC5148083          DOI: 10.1118/1.4864244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  110 in total

1.  Two-effective-source method for the calculation of in-air output at various source-to-detector distances in wedged fields.

Authors:  S Kim; C Liu; C Chen; J R Palta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monitor unit calculation for an intensity modulated photon field by a simple scatter-summation algorithm.

Authors:  L Xing; Y Chen; G Luxton; J G Li; A L Boyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Comment on "Analytical representation of enhanced dynamic wedge factors for symmetric and asymmetric fields".

Authors:  W Ansbacher; C Neath
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  AUTOMATION OF RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING. IV. DERIVATION OF A MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION FOR THE PER CENT DEPTH DOSE SURFACE OF COBALT 60 BEAMS AND VISUALISATION OF MULTIPLE FIELD DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS.

Authors:  T D STERLING; H PERRY; L KATZ
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Beam modeling and verification of a photon beam multisource model.

Authors:  Anders Ahnesjö; Lars Weber; Anders Murman; Mikael Saxner; Ingvar Thorslund; Erik Traneus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Validation of a new virtual wedge model.

Authors:  G E Desobry; T J Waldron; I J Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Multiple machine implementation of enhanced dynamic wedge.

Authors:  E E Klein; R Gerber; X R Zhu; F Oehmke; J A Purdy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Corrections to absorbed dose calculations for tissue inhomogeneities.

Authors:  M R Sontag; J R Cunningham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dosimetric evaluation of the Siemens Virtual Wedge.

Authors:  J van Santvoort
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  14 in total

1.  A simple and fast physics-based analytical method to calculate therapeutic and stray doses from external beam, megavoltage x-ray therapy.

Authors:  Lydia J Jagetic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Inverse-planned deliverable 4D-IMRT for lung SBRT.

Authors:  Mahdi Hamzeei; Arezoo Modiri; Narges Kazemzadeh; Aaron Hagan; Amit Sawant
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Application of radiochromic gel dosimetry to commissioning of a megavoltage research linear accelerator for small-field animal irradiation studies.

Authors:  Noora Ba Sunbul; Ibrahim Oraiqat; Benjamin Rosen; Cameron Miller; Christopher Meert; Martha M Matuszak; Shaun Clarke; Sara Pozzi; Jean M Moran; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of two programs in calculating electron output factors at extended source-surface distances.

Authors:  Yunfei Hu; Jonathan Andrew Lambert; Yang Wang
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  Design and evaluation of electron beam energy degraders for breast boost irradiation.

Authors:  Jong In Park; Sung Whan Ha; Jung-In Kim; Hyunseok Lee; Jaegi Lee; Il Han Kim; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Clinical implementation of an electron monitor unit dosimetry system based on task group 71 report and a commercial calculation program.

Authors:  Huijun Xu; Mariana Guerrero; Shifeng Chen; Xiaocheng Yang; Karl Prado; Colleen Schinkel
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  Two-year experience with the commercial Gamma Knife Check software.

Authors:  Andy Yuanguang Xu; Jagdish Bhatnagar; Greg Bednarz; Josef Novotny; John Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs.

Authors:  Marcelino Hermida-López; David Sánchez-Artuñedo; Juan Francisco Calvo-Ortega
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields.

Authors:  Fatemeh Seif; Nayyer Mostafavi; Mohammadreza Bayatiyani; Hossein Taheri
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2019-07-25

10.  A Model for Secondary Monitor Unit Calculations of PBS Proton Therapy Treatment Plans.

Authors:  Greg Schimke; Joseph Syh; Hsinshun Terry Wu
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2019-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.