Literature DB >> 28425084

Independent dose verification for brain stereotactic radiotherapy using different add-on micro multi-leaf collimators.

Shiro Nishiyama1, Satoru Ishibashi2, Ryo Takahashi3, Hidenobu Tachibana4.   

Abstract

An add-on micro multi-leaf collimator (mMLC) is used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), in which rotational radiotherapy may make more complex and time-consuming. We performed a retrospective study of an independent dose calculation verification for brain SRS and SRT in two institutions to show the accuracy of the verification system and propose a tolerance value for the verification. Several comparisons of static plans and patients' plans were conducted using a phantom measurement, and patients' plans using the patients' own computed tomography image. We evaluated the accuracy of the Clarkson-based dose calculation based on either the equivalent square field formed by the mMLC or by the collimator jaws to determine the collimator scatter factor (S c). The results for the static plans showed good agreement (<1%), except when we used a 1 cm2 field size (<4%). The phantom measurements for the patients' plans showed deviations of 0.1 ± 2.3 and 1.2 ± 1.6% (2 SD) for the treatment planning system and the verification system, respectively. The patients' plans showed a deviation of 2.0 ± 2.1% (2 SD). Depending on the mMLC system, the S c was calculated using the equivalent field size formed by the mMLC. In this study, we suggest a tolerance level for the brain SRS and SRT of 2-3.5%. However, beam modeling in the treatment planning system would affect the deviation. The S c should be computed according to the size of the collimator fitted to the MLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; Independent calculation verification; Rotational radiotherapy; SRS; SRT

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28425084     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-017-0398-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  13 in total

1.  GammaPlan-Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery treatment planning verification method.

Authors:  S M Marcu; Q J Wu; K Pillai; M S Weinhous
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Independent calculations to validate monitor units from ADAC treatment planning system.

Authors:  Komanduri M Ayyangar; Cheng B Saw; Darren Gearheart; Bin Shen; Robert Thompson
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.482

Review 3.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  B Fraass; K Doppke; M Hunt; G Kutcher; G Starkschall; R Stern; J Van Dyke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Report of AAPM TG 135: quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Sonja Dieterich; Carlo Cavedon; Cynthia F Chuang; Alan B Cohen; Jeffrey A Garrett; Charles L Lee; Jessica R Lowenstein; Maximian F d'Souza; David D Taylor; Xiaodong Wu; Cheng Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Verification of monitor unit calculations for non-IMRT clinical radiotherapy: report of AAPM Task Group 114.

Authors:  Robin L Stern; Robert Heaton; Martin W Fraser; S Murty Goddu; Thomas H Kirby; Kwok Leung Lam; Andrea Molineu; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers.

Authors:  J Van Dyk; R B Barnett; J E Cygler; P C Shragge
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-05-20       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Verifying monitor unit calculations for tangential whole breast fields in 3-dimensional planning.

Authors:  Ian Kay; Tyler Meyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Comparison of monitor unit calculations performed with a 3D computerized planning system and independent "hand" calculations: results of three years clinical experience.

Authors:  Jackson Chan; David Russell; Victor G Peters; Thomas J Farrell
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Validation of a modern second-check dosimetry system using a novel verification phantom.

Authors:  Daniel G McDonald; Dustin J Jacqmin; Christopher J Mart; Nicholas C Koch; Jean L Peng; Michael S Ashenafi; Mario A Fugal; Kenneth N Vanek
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Verifying monitor unit calculations for tangential breast fields.

Authors:  Ian Kay; Peter Dunscombe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.