Literature DB >> 21361202

Estimation of three-dimensional intrinsic dosimetric uncertainties resulting from using deformable image registration for dose mapping.

Francisco J Salguero1, Nahla K Saleh-Sayah, Chenyu Yan, Jeffrey V Siebers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article presents a general procedural framework to assess the point-by-point precision in mapped dose associated with the intrinsic uncertainty of a deformable image registration (DIR) for any arbitrary patient.
METHODS: Dose uncertainty is obtained via a three-step process. In the first step, for each voxel in an imaging pair, a cluster of points is obtained by an iterative DIR procedure. In the second step, the dispersion of the points due to the imprecision of the DIR method is used to compute the spatial uncertainty. Two different ways to quantify the spatial uncertainty are presented in this work. Method A consists of a one-dimensional analysis of the modules of the position vectors, whereas method B performs a more detailed 3D analysis of the coordinates of the points. In the third step, the resulting spatial uncertainty estimates are used in combination with the mapped dose distribution to compute the point-by-point dose standard deviation. The process is demonstrated to estimate the dose uncertainty induced by mapping a 62.6 Gy dose delivered on maximum exhale to maximum inhale of a ten-phase four-dimensional lung CT.
RESULTS: For the demonstration lung image pair, the standard deviation of inconsistency vectors is found to be up to 9.2 mm with a mean sigma of 1.3 mm. This uncertainty results in a maximum estimated dose uncertainty of 29.65 Gy if method A is used and 21.81 Gy for method B. The calculated volume with dose uncertainty above 10.00 Gy is 602 cm3 for method A and 1422 cm3 for method B.
CONCLUSIONS: This procedure represents a useful tool to evaluate the precision of a mapped dose distribution due to the intrinsic DIR uncertainty in a patient. The procedure is flexible, allowing incorporation of alternative intrinsic error models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361202      PMCID: PMC3021560          DOI: 10.1118/1.3528201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

Review 1.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas Rockwell Mackie; Jeff Kapatoes; Ken Ruchala; Weiguo Lu; Chuan Wu; Gustavo Olivera; Lisa Forrest; Wolfgang Tome; Jim Welsh; Robert Jeraj; Paul Harari; Paul Reckwerdt; Bhudatt Paliwal; Mark Ritter; Harry Keller; Jack Fowler; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations.

Authors:  Weiguo Lu; Ming-Li Chen; Gustavo H Olivera; Kenneth J Ruchala; Thomas R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Does elastic tissue intrafraction motion with density changes forbid motion-compensated radiotherapy?

Authors:  S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A direct voxel tracking method for four-dimensional Monte Carlo dose calculations in deforming anatomy.

Authors:  Emily Heath; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of an automated deformable image matching method for quantifying lung motion in respiration-correlated CT images.

Authors:  A Pevsner; B Davis; S Joshi; A Hertanto; J Mechalakos; E Yorke; K Rosenzweig; S Nehmeh; Y E Erdi; J L Humm; S Larson; C C Ling; G S Mageras
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics.

Authors:  G E Christensen; R D Rabbitt; M I Miller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: a multi-institution study.

Authors:  Rojano Kashani; Martina Hub; James M Balter; Marc L Kessler; Lei Dong; Lifei Zhang; Lei Xing; Yaoqin Xie; David Hawkes; Julia A Schnabel; Jamie McClelland; Sarang Joshi; Quan Chen; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Truth cube: establishing physical standards for soft tissue simulation.

Authors:  Amy E Kerdok; Stephane M Cotin; Mark P Ottensmeyer; Anna M Galea; Robert D Howe; Steven L Dawson
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy.

Authors:  He Wang; Lei Dong; Jennifer O'Daniel; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Deborah A Kuban; Mark Bonnen; Joe Y Chang; Rex Cheung
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The utilization of consistency metrics for error analysis in deformable image registration.

Authors:  Edward T Bender; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  12 in total

1.  A stochastic approach to estimate the uncertainty of dose mapping caused by uncertainties in b-spline registration.

Authors:  Martina Hub; Christian Thieke; Marc L Kessler; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A method to estimate the effect of deformable image registration uncertainties on daily dose mapping.

Authors:  Martin J Murphy; Francisco J Salguero; Jeffrey V Siebers; David Staub; Constantin Vaman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A mass-conserving 4D XCAT phantom for dose calculation and accumulation.

Authors:  Christopher L Williams; Pankaj Mishra; Joao Seco; Sara St James; Raymond H Mak; Ross I Berbeco; John H Lewis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effect of deformable registration on the dose calculated in radiation therapy planning CT scans of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Alexandra R Cunliffe; Clay Contee; Samuel G Armato; Bradley White; Julia Justusson; Renuka Malik; Hania A Al-Hallaq
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.

Authors:  Ziad H Saleh; Aditya P Apte; Gregory C Sharp; Nadezhda P Shusharina; Ya Wang; Harini Veeraraghavan; Maria Thor; Ludvig P Muren; Shyam S Rao; Nancy Y Lee; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  MIRSIG position paper: the use of image registration and fusion algorithms in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Lowther; Rob Louwe; Johnson Yuen; Nicholas Hardcastle; Adam Yeo; Michael Jameson
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-05-06

7.  Using patient-specific phantoms to evaluate deformable image registration algorithms for adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nick Stanley; Carri Glide-Hurst; Jinkoo Kim; Jeffrey Adams; Shunshan Li; Ning Wen; Indrin J Chetty; Hualiang Zhong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Dose mapping sensitivity to deformable registration uncertainties in fractionated radiotherapy - applied to prostate proton treatments.

Authors:  David Tilly; Nina Tilly; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2013-06-14

9.  A quantitative comparison of the performance of three deformable registration algorithms in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniella Fabri; Valentina Zambrano; Amon Bhatia; Hugo Furtado; Helmar Bergmann; Markus Stock; Christoph Bloch; Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig; Supriyanto Pawiro; Dietmar Georg; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Michael Figl
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.820

10.  Evaluation of accuracy of B-spline transformation-based deformable image registration with different parameter settings for thoracic images.

Authors:  Takayuki Kanai; Noriyuki Kadoya; Kengo Ito; Yusuke Onozato; Sang Yong Cho; Kazuma Kishi; Suguru Dobashi; Rei Umezawa; Haruo Matsushita; Ken Takeda; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.