Literature DB >> 25563279

Effect of deformable registration on the dose calculated in radiation therapy planning CT scans of lung cancer patients.

Alexandra R Cunliffe1, Clay Contee2, Samuel G Armato1, Bradley White1, Julia Justusson1, Renuka Malik2, Hania A Al-Hallaq2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of deformable image registration of serial computed tomography (CT) scans on the radiation dose calculated from a treatment planning scan.
METHODS: Eighteen patients who received curative doses (≥ 60 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction) of photon radiation therapy for lung cancer treatment were retrospectively identified. For each patient, a diagnostic-quality pretherapy (4-75 days) CT scan and a treatment planning scan with an associated dose map were collected. To establish correspondence between scan pairs, a researcher manually identified anatomically corresponding landmark point pairs between the two scans. Pretherapy scans then were coregistered with planning scans (and associated dose maps) using the demons deformable registration algorithm and two variants of the Fraunhofer MEVIS algorithm ("Fast" and "EMPIRE10"). Landmark points in each pretherapy scan were automatically mapped to the planning scan using the displacement vector field output from each of the three algorithms. The Euclidean distance between manually and automatically mapped landmark points (dE) and the absolute difference in planned dose (|ΔD|) were calculated. Using regression modeling, |ΔD| was modeled as a function of dE, dose (D), dose standard deviation (SD(dose)) in an eight-pixel neighborhood, and the registration algorithm used.
RESULTS: Over 1400 landmark point pairs were identified, with 58-93 (median: 84) points identified per patient. Average |ΔD| across patients was 3.5 Gy (range: 0.9-10.6 Gy). Registration accuracy was highest using the Fraunhofer MEVIS EMPIRE10 algorithm, with an average dE across patients of 5.2 mm (compared with >7 mm for the other two algorithms). Consequently, average |ΔD| was also lowest using the Fraunhofer MEVIS EMPIRE10 algorithm. |ΔD| increased significantly as a function of dE (0.42 Gy/mm), D (0.05 Gy/Gy), SD(dose) (1.4 Gy/Gy), and the algorithm used (≤ 1 Gy).
CONCLUSIONS: An average error of <4 Gy in radiation dose was introduced when points were mapped between CT scan pairs using deformable registration, with the majority of points yielding dose-mapping error <2 Gy (approximately 3% of the total prescribed dose). Registration accuracy was highest using the Fraunhofer MEVIS EMPIRE10 algorithm, resulting in the smallest errors in mapped dose. Dose differences following registration increased significantly with increasing spatial registration errors, dose, and dose gradient (i.e., SDdose). This model provides a measurement of the uncertainty in the radiation dose when points are mapped between serial CT scans through deformable registration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25563279      PMCID: PMC4282677          DOI: 10.1118/1.4903267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Semi-automatic construction of reference standards for evaluation of image registration.

Authors:  K Murphy; B van Ginneken; S Klein; M Staring; B J de Hoop; M A Viergever; J P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  A hybrid multimodal non-rigid registration of MR images based on diffeomorphic demons.

Authors:  Huanxiang Lu; Philippe C Cattin; Mauricio Reyes
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

3.  A method to map errors in the deformable registration of 4DCT images.

Authors:  Constantin Vaman; David Staub; Jeffrey Williamson; Martin J Murphy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung.

Authors:  Lawrence B Marks; Soren M Bentzen; Joseph O Deasy; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Jeffrey D Bradley; Ivan S Vogelius; Issam El Naqa; Jessica L Hubbs; Joos V Lebesque; Robert D Timmerman; Mary K Martel; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Terry Peters; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge.

Authors:  Keelin Murphy; Bram van Ginneken; Joseph M Reinhardt; Sven Kabus; Kai Ding; Xiang Deng; Kunlin Cao; Kaifang Du; Gary E Christensen; Vincent Garcia; Tom Vercauteren; Nicholas Ayache; Olivier Commowick; Grégoire Malandain; Ben Glocker; Nikos Paragios; Nassir Navab; Vladlena Gorbunova; Jon Sporring; Marleen de Bruijne; Xiao Han; Mattias P Heinrich; Julia A Schnabel; Mark Jenkinson; Cristian Lorenz; Marc Modat; Jamie R McClelland; Sébastien Ourselin; Sascha E A Muenzing; Max A Viergever; Dante De Nigris; D Louis Collins; Tal Arbel; Marta Peroni; Rui Li; Gregory C Sharp; Alexander Schmidt-Richberg; Jan Ehrhardt; René Werner; Dirk Smeets; Dirk Loeckx; Gang Song; Nicholas Tustison; Brian Avants; James C Gee; Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Berend C Stoel; Martin Urschler; Manuel Werlberger; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Simon Rit; David Sarrut; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Estimation of three-dimensional intrinsic dosimetric uncertainties resulting from using deformable image registration for dose mapping.

Authors:  Francisco J Salguero; Nahla K Saleh-Sayah; Chenyu Yan; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Estimation of the uncertainty of elastic image registration with the demons algorithm.

Authors:  M Hub; C P Karger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Time and dose-related changes in radiological lung density after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Erik C J Phernambucq; David A Palma; Andrew Vincent; Egbert F Smit; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Lung texture in serial thoracic CT scans: assessment of change introduced by image registration.

Authors:  Alexandra R Cunliffe; Hania A Al-Hallaq; Zacariah E Labby; Charles A Pelizzari; Christopher Straus; William F Sensakovic; Michelle Ludwig; Samuel G Armato
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lung texture in serial thoracic computed tomography scans: correlation of radiomics-based features with radiation therapy dose and radiation pneumonitis development.

Authors:  Alexandra Cunliffe; Samuel G Armato; Richard Castillo; Ngoc Pham; Thomas Guerrero; Hania A Al-Hallaq
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  CALIPER: A deformable image registration algorithm for large geometric changes during radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christopher L Guy; Elisabeth Weiss; Gary E Christensen; Nuzhat Jan; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Effect of an iterative reconstruction quantum noise reduction technique on computed tomography radiomic features.

Authors:  Joseph J Foy; Mena Shenouda; Sahar Ramahi; Samuel Armato; Daniel Thomas Ginat
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-12-30

4.  The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.

Authors:  An Qin; Dan Ionascu; Jian Liang; Xiao Han; Nicolette O'Connell; Di Yan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 5.  Radiomics for Response and Outcome Assessment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Liting Shi; Yaoyao He; Zilong Yuan; Stanley Benedict; Richard Valicenti; Jianfeng Qiu; Yi Rong
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.