Literature DB >> 21350969

Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.

Fabien Seldran1, Stéphane Gallego, Christophe Micheyl, Evelyne Veuillet, Eric Truy, Hung Thai-Van.   

Abstract

The factors responsible for interindividual differences in speech-understanding ability among hearing-impaired listeners are not well understood. Although audibility has been found to account for some of this variability, other factors may play a role. This study sought to examine whether part of the large interindividual variability of speech-recognition performance in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss could be accounted for by differences in hearing-loss onset type (early, progressive, or sudden), age at hearing-loss onset, or hearing-loss duration. Other potential factors including age, hearing thresholds, speech-presentation levels, and speech audibility were controlled. Percent-correct (PC) scores for syllables in dissyllabic words, which were either unprocessed or lowpass filtered at cutoff frequencies ranging from 250 to 2,000 Hz, were measured in 20 subjects (40 ears) with severe-to-profound hearing losses above 1 kHz. For comparison purposes, 20 normal-hearing subjects (20 ears) were also tested using the same filtering conditions and a range of speech levels (10-80 dB SPL). Significantly higher asymptotic PCs were observed in the early (<=4 years) hearing-loss onset group than in both the progressive- and sudden-onset groups, even though the three groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, hearing thresholds, or speech audibility. In addition, significant negative correlations between PC and hearing-loss onset age, and positive correlations between PC and hearing-loss duration were observed. These variables accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in speech-intelligibility scores than, and were not significantly correlated with, speech audibility, as quantified using a variant of the articulation index. Although the lack of statistical independence between hearing-loss onset type, hearing-loss onset age, hearing-loss duration, and age complicate and limit the interpretation of the results, these findings indicate that other variables than audibility can influence speech intelligibility in listeners with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350969      PMCID: PMC3123445          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0261-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  41 in total

1.  Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  C M Rankovic
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-04

3.  Probability of being correct with 1 of M orthogonal signals.

Authors:  D M Green; H P Dai
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

4.  Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills.

Authors:  Y C Tong; P A Busby; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.

Authors:  Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian Glasberg; Anne Schlueter
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

7.  Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Kamm; D D Dirks; T S Bell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.

Authors:  C V Pavlovic
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks; D E Ellison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks; A B Schaefer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

2.  A sensitive period for the impact of hearing loss on auditory perception.

Authors:  Bradley N Buran; Emma C Sarro; Francis A M Manno; Ramanjot Kang; Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  No Association Between Time of Onset of Hearing Loss (Childhood Versus Adulthood) and Self-Reported Hearing Handicap in Adults.

Authors:  Lisa Aarhus; Kristian Tambs; Bo Engdahl
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover; Michael Blackburn; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Meta-Analytic Findings on Reading in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Fatima Sibaii; Kejin Lee; Makayla J Gill; Jonathan L Hatch
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

7.  Association of hearing loss with depression, anxiety and stress in patients suffering from Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.

Authors:  Shafaque Mehboob; Sm Tariq Rafi; Naveed Ahmed
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 9.  Measuring Recovery in Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Tinnitus Patients in a Mental Health Care Setting: Validation of the I.ROC.

Authors:  Karin C M Roze; Corrie Tijsseling; Bridey Rudd; Bea G Tiemens
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2020-04-05

10.  Weakening of interaction networks with aging in tip-link protein induces hearing loss.

Authors:  Surbhi Garg; Amin Sagar; Gayathri S Singaraju; Rahul Dani; Naimat K Bari; Athi N Naganathan; Sabyasachi Rakshit
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.