Literature DB >> 6725776

Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.

C V Pavlovic.   

Abstract

Two experiments were performed to explore the feasibility of deriving an articulation index (AI) based scheme for quantifying residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. In the first experiment the AI procedure was applied to audiograms of normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired individuals in order to predict speech discrimination under various conditions. Good predictions were found for the normal and the less impaired subjects, but not for those with greater impairments. These subjects exhibited a disproportionate loss in speech discrimination compared to that predicted on the basis of the AI procedure. In the second experiment it was investigated whether the AI predictions for presbycusic individuals could be improved by making use of the proficiency factor that is not a function of frequency. The results indicate that the deficit in suprathreshold speech processing is frequency-specific and that, therefore, the proficiency factor is not independent of frequency. It assumes the value of 1 at those frequencies where hearing sensitivity is normal and is substantially reduced for frequencies where hearing threshold is elevated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6725776     DOI: 10.1121/1.390731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

2.  Adaptive bandwidth measurements of importance functions for speech intelligibility prediction.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of audibility and novel word learning ability on vocabulary level in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

4.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

5.  Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.

Authors:  Chiemi Tanaka; Anh Nguyen-Huynh; Katherine Loera; Gemaine Stark; Lina Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Fabien Seldran; Stéphane Gallego; Christophe Micheyl; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-25

8.  Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Earl E Johnson; Erin Picou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 10.  Conventional Amplification for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen; Emily A Benson; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.