Literature DB >> 19955720

Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Brian C J Moore, Brian Glasberg, Anne Schlueter.   

Abstract

A dead region is a region in the cochlea where the inner hair cells and/or the auditory neurones are functioning very poorly, if at all. People who are being considered for a combination of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid typically have a dead region in the parts of the cochlea that normally respond to medium and high frequencies, but have some functional hearing at lower frequencies. For such people, it may be useful to determine the edge frequency, f(e), of any dead region. This may be relevant to choosing the most appropriate insertion depth of the electrode array, and to the way that frequencies in the input signal are mapped to acoustic and electric stimulation. It may also be helpful in interpreting the results of research studies. This paper reviews methods for diagnosing dead regions and defining the value of f(e). It is argued that the value of f(e) cannot be determined reliably from the audiogram, although a dead region is likely to be present at a given frequency when the hearing loss at that frequency is 70 dB or more. When a sinusoidal signal is reported as sounding highly distorted or noise-like, a dead region may be present at the signal frequency, but again this is not a reliable indicator. The TEN test is a simple clinical method for diagnosis of dead regions. Where this test gives a positive diagnosis, it is recommended that psychophysical tuning curves be measured to define the value of f(e) more precisely. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955720     DOI: 10.1159/000262595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  5 in total

1.  Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Fabien Seldran; Stéphane Gallego; Christophe Micheyl; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-25

Review 2.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  [Pathophysiology of hearing loss : Classification and treatment options].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  A Hearing-Model-Based Active-Learning Test for the Determination of Dead Regions.

Authors:  Josef Schlittenlacher; Richard E Turner; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Comparing Rapid and Traditional Forward-Masked Spatial Tuning Curves in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Lindsay A DeVries; Julie G Arenberg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.