Literature DB >> 12243160

Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.

Thomas Baer1, Brian C J Moore, Karolina Kluk.   

Abstract

People with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss differ in the benefit they gain from amplification of high frequencies when listening to speech. Using vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) stimuli in quiet that were amplified and then low pass filtered with various cutoff frequencies, Vickers et aL [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1164-1175 (2001)] found that the benefit from amplification of high-frequency components was related to the presence or absence of a cochlear dead region at high frequencies. For hearing-impaired subjects without dead regions, performance improved with increasing cutoff frequency up to 7.5 kHz (the highest value tested). Subjects with high-frequency dead regions showed no improvement when the cutoff frequency was increased above about 1.7 times the edge frequency of the dead region. The present study was similar to that of Vickers et al. but used VCV stimuli presented in background noise. Ten subjects with high-frequency hearing loss, including eight from the study of Vickers et al., were tested. Five had dead regions starting below 2 kHz, and five had no dead regions. Speech stimuli at a nominal level of 65 dB were mixed with spectrally matched noise, amplified according to the "Cambridge" prescriptive formula for each subject and then low pass filtered. The noise level was chosen separately for each subject to give a moderate reduction in intelligibility relative to listening in quiet. For subjects without dead regions, performance generally improved with increasing cutoff frequency up to 7.5 kHz, on average more so in noise than in quiet. For most subjects with dead regions, performance improved with cutoff frequency up to 1.5-2 times the edge frequency of the dead region, but hardly changed with further increases. Calculations of speech audibility using a modified version of the articulation index showed that application of the Cambridge formula was at least partially successful in making high-frequency components of the speech audible for subjects with dead regions, and that such subjects often failed to benefit from increased audibility of the speech at high frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243160     DOI: 10.1121/1.1498853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise.

Authors:  Andrea Bohnert; Myriel Nyffeler; Annerose Keilmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.

Authors:  James Shehorn; Nicole Marrone; Thomas Muller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Nonlinear frequency compression: Influence of start frequency and input bandwidth on consonant and vowel recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Voiced initial consonant perception deficits in older listeners with hearing loss and good and poor word recognition.

Authors:  Susan L Phillips; Scott J Richter; David McPherson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 9.  Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

10.  Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; J Andrew Dundas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.