Literature DB >> 21347864

The bivalency effect: adjustment of cognitive control without response set priming.

Alodie Rey-Mermet1, Beat Meier.   

Abstract

The occasional occurrence of bivalent stimuli, that is, stimuli with features relevant to two tasks, slows performance on subsequent tasks with univalent stimuli, including those which have no common features with bivalent stimuli (i.e., the "bivalency effect"). We have suggested that the bivalency effect might stem from an episodic context binding arising from the occasional occurrence of bivalent stimuli. However, as the same response set is used usually for univalent and bivalent stimuli, bivalent stimulus features may be negatively primed via response features. We investigated this possibility in two experiments, in which one group of participants used the same response keys for all tasks and another group used separate response keys. The results showed a comparable bivalency effect in both groups. Thus, it rather results from episodic context binding than from response set priming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21347864     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0322-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  24 in total

1.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh; Paul Laurey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Bernhard Hommel; Alan Allport
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Task conflict effect in task switching.

Authors:  Ami Braverman; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-03-23

5.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  See what you've done! Active touch affects the number of perceived visual objects.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

7.  Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Yoav Kessler; Esther Adi-Japha
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-19

Review 8.  Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.

Authors:  Marco Steinhauser; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Episodic S-R bindings and emotion: about the influence of positive and negative action effects on stimulus-response associations.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Vanida Pholulamdeth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  The bivalency effect in task switching: event-related potentials.

Authors:  John G Grundy; Miriam F F Benarroch; Todd S Woodward; Paul D Metzak; Jennifer C Whitman; Judith M Shedden
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A role for recency of response conflict in producing the bivalency effect.

Authors:  John G Grundy; Judith M Shedden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-22

3.  Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-28

4.  Post-conflict slowing effects in monolingual and bilingual children.

Authors:  John G Grundy; Aram Keyvani Chahi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-10-16

5.  The bivalency effect represents an interference-triggered adjustment of cognitive control: an ERP study.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Thomas Koenig; Beat Meier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  An orienting response is not enough: Bivalency not infrequency causes the bivalency effect.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-09-20

7.  Beyond feature binding: interference from episodic context binding creates the bivalency effect in task-switching.

Authors:  Beat Meier; Alodie Rey-Mermet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.