Literature DB >> 19803645

Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.

Marco Steinhauser1, Ronald Hübner.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that performance in the Stroop task is influenced by response conflict as well as task conflict. The present study investigated the idea that both conflict types can be isolated by applying ex-Gaussian distribution analysis which decomposes response time into a Gaussian and an exponential component. Two experiments were conducted in which manual versions of a standard Stroop task (Experiment 1) and a separated Stroop task (Experiment 2) were performed under task-switching conditions. Effects of response congruency and stimulus bivalency were used to measure response conflict and task conflict, respectively. Ex-Gaussian analysis revealed that response conflict was mainly observed in the Gaussian component, whereas task conflict was stronger in the exponential component. Moreover, task conflict in the exponential component was selectively enhanced under task-switching conditions. The results suggest that ex-Gaussian analysis can be used as a tool to isolate different conflict types in the Stroop task. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19803645     DOI: 10.1037/a0016467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  49 in total

1.  Task conflict effect in task switching.

Authors:  Ami Braverman; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-03-23

2.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

3.  Modeling the interaction of numerosity and perceptual variables with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Inhan Kang; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Does response modality influence conflict? Modelling vocal and manual response Stroop interference.

Authors:  Alex Fennell; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching.

Authors:  Eyal Kalanthroff; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-28

6.  A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task.

Authors:  Heike Elchlepp; Aureliu Lavric; Guy A Mizon; Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The bivalency effect: adjustment of cognitive control without response set priming.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-02-24

8.  Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; James D Miles; Giulia Baroni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

9.  Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov; Yoella Bereby-Meyer; Nitzan Shahar
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-25

10.  The influence of acute and chronic alcohol consumption on response time distribution in adolescent rhesus macaques.

Authors:  M Jerry Wright; Sophia A Vandewater; Michael A Taffe
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.