Literature DB >> 30047769

Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.

Mallorie Leinenger1.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have provided evidence that readers generate phonological codes while reading. However, a central question in much of this research has been how early these codes are generated. Answering this question has implications for the roles that phonological coding might play for skilled readers, especially whether phonological codes affect the identification of most words, which can only be the case if these codes are generated rapidly. To investigate the time course of phonological coding during silent reading, the present series of experiments examined survival analyses of first-fixation durations on phonologically related (homophones, pseudohomophones) and orthographic control (orthographically matched words and nonwords) stimuli that were either embedded in sentences in place of correct targets (Experiments 1 and 2) or presented as parafoveal previews for correct targets using the boundary paradigm (Experiments 3 and 4). Survival analyses revealed a discernible difference between processing the phonologically related versus the orthographic control items by as early as 160 ms from the start of fixation on average (160-173 ms across experiments). Because only approximately 18% of first fixation durations were shorter than these mean estimates and follow-up tests revealed that earlier divergence point estimates were associated with shorter gaze durations (e.g., more rapid word identification), results suggest that skilled readers rapidly generate phonological codes during normal, silent reading and that these codes may affect the identification of most words. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30047769      PMCID: PMC6348047          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  42 in total

1.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements.

Authors:  D Jared; B A Levy; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

2.  The when and where of reading in the brain.

Authors:  S C Sereno; K Rayner
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors:  M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Rowed to recovery: the use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English.

Authors:  G Feng; K Miller; H Shu; H Zhang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Laurent Sparrow
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Lesch; R K Morris; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill.

Authors:  Kathryn H Chace; Keith Rayner; Arnold D Well
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-09

9.  The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Erik D Reichle; Michael J Stroud; Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-09

10.  The time course of phonological and orthographic processing of acronyms in reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.