Literature DB >> 21305605

Association of hip strength estimates by finite-element analysis with fractures in women and men.

Shreyasee Amin1, David L Kopperdhal, L Joseph Melton, Sara J Achenbach, Terry M Therneau, B Lawrence Riggs, Tony M Keaveny, Sundeep Khosla.   

Abstract

Finite-element analysis (FEA) of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans can estimate site-specific whole-bone strength. However, it is uncertain whether the site-specific detail included in FEA-estimated proximal femur (hip) strength can determine fracture risk at sites with different biomechanical characteristics. To address this question, we used FEA of proximal femur QCT scans to estimate hip strength and load-to-strength ratio during a simulated sideways fall and measured total hip areal and volumetric bone mineral density (aBMD and vBMD) from QCT images in an age-stratified random sample of community-dwelling adults age 35 years or older. Among 314 women (mean age ± SD: 61 ± 15 years; 235 postmenopausal) and 266 men (62 ± 16 years), 139 women and 104 men had any prevalent fracture, whereas 55 Women and 28 men had a prevalent osteoporotic fracture that had occurred at age 35 years or older. Odds ratios by age-adjusted logistic regression analysis for prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures each were similar for FEA hip strength and load-to-strength ratio, as well as for total hip aBMD and vBMD. C-statistics (estimated areas under ROC curves) also were similar [eg, 0.84 to 0.85 (women) and 0.75 to 0.78 (men) for osteoporotic fractures]. In women and men, the association with prevalent osteoporotic fractures increased below an estimated hip strength of approximately 3000 N. Despite its site-specific nature, FEA-estimated hip strength worked equally well at predicting prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures. Furthermore, an estimated hip strength below 3000 N may represent a critical level of systemic skeletal fragility in both sexes that warrants further investigation.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305605      PMCID: PMC3201782          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  31 in total

1.  Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site.

Authors:  E F Morgan; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Harun H Bayraktar; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

Authors:  Harun H Bayraktar; Elise F Morgan; Glen L Niebur; Grayson E Morris; Eric K Wong; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Clinical practice. Screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lawrence G Raisz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Peggy A Rouleau; Cynthia H McCollough; Sundeep Khosla; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Age- and sex-specific differences in the factor of risk for vertebral fracture: a population-based study using QCT.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; L Joseph Melton; B Lawrence Riggs; John Muller; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Peggy A Rouleau; Cynthia H McCollough; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time.

Authors:  L J Melton; C S Crowson; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA.

Authors:  D D Cody; G J Gross; F J Hou; H J Spencer; S A Goldstein; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton Iii; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Elizabeth J Atkinson; James M Peterson; Peggy A Rouleau; Cynthia H McCollough; Mary L Bouxsein; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  S C E Schuit; M van der Klift; A E A M Weel; C E D H de Laet; H Burger; E Seeman; A Hofman; A G Uitterlinden; J P T M van Leeuwen; H A P Pols
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  45 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Trabecular Plate Loss and Deteriorating Elastic Modulus of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Bin Zhou; Ian Parkinson; C David L Thomas; John G Clement; Nick Fazzalari; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 3.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Polarization control of Raman spectroscopy optimizes the assessment of bone tissue.

Authors:  Alexander J Makowski; Chetan A Patil; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 6.  Measuring bone quality.

Authors:  Elisa Torres-del-Pliego; Laia Vilaplana; Roberto Güerri-Fernández; Adolfo Diez-Pérez
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  The morphology of the mouse masticatory musculature.

Authors:  Hester Baverstock; Nathan S Jeffery; Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical ct data for hip fracture prediction.

Authors:  Yves Pauchard; Thomas Fitze; Diego Browarnik; Amiraslan Eskandari; Irene Pauchard; William Enns-Bray; Halldór Pálsson; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Stephen J Ferguson; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Benedikt Helgason
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.763

9.  Regional Variations of HR-pQCT Morphological and Biomechanical Measurements of the Distal Radius and Tibia and Their Associations with Whole Bone Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Zhendong Zhang; Yizhong Hu; Ji Wang; Y Eric Yu; Shashank Nawathe; Kyle K Nishiyama; Tony M Keaveny; Elizabeth Shane; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.

Authors:  F Taddei; C Falcinelli; L Balistreri; P Henys; F Baruffaldi; S Sigurdsson; V Gudnason; T B Harris; R Dietzel; G Armbrecht; S Boutroy; E Schileo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.