Literature DB >> 27161828

Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical ct data for hip fracture prediction.

Yves Pauchard1, Thomas Fitze1, Diego Browarnik1, Amiraslan Eskandari2,3, Irene Pauchard4, William Enns-Bray2, Halldór Pálsson3, Sigurdur Sigurdsson5, Stephen J Ferguson2, Tamara B Harris6, Vilmundur Gudnason5,7, Benedikt Helgason2.   

Abstract

In this study, we propose interactive graph cut image segmentation for fast creation of femur finite element (FE) models from clinical computed tomography scans for hip fracture prediction. Using a sample of N = 48 bone scans representing normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects, the proximal femur was segmented using manual (gold standard) and graph cut segmentation. Segmentations were subsequently used to generate FE models to calculate overall stiffness and peak force in a sideways fall simulations. Results show that, comparable FE results can be obtained with the graph cut method, with a reduction from 20 to 2-5 min interaction time. Average differences between segmentation methods of 0.22 mm were not significantly correlated with differences in FE derived stiffness (R2 = 0.08, p = 0.05) and weakly correlated to differences in FE derived peak force (R2 = 0.16, p = 0.01). We further found that changes in automatically assigned boundary conditions as a consequence of small segmentation differences were significantly correlated with FE derived results. The proposed interactive graph cut segmentation software MITK-GEM is freely available online at https://simtk.org/home/mitk-gem .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip fracture prediction; clinical computed tomography; femur segmentation; image segmentation; image-based finite element modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27161828      PMCID: PMC5871234          DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1181173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

Authors:  Harun H Bayraktar; Elise F Morgan; Glen L Niebur; Grayson E Morris; Eric K Wong; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  On the mechanical stability of porous coated press fit titanium implants: a finite element study of a pushout test.

Authors:  Benedikt Helgason; Marco Viceconti; Tómas P Rúnarsson; Sigurour Brynjólfsson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Fracture burden in relation to low bone mineral density and FRAX(®) probability.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Suzanne Morin
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J Parkkari; P Kannus; M Palvanen; A Natri; J Vainio; H Aho; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Association of hip strength estimates by finite-element analysis with fractures in women and men.

Authors:  Shreyasee Amin; David L Kopperdhal; L Joseph Melton; Sara J Achenbach; Terry M Therneau; B Lawrence Riggs; Tony M Keaveny; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility Study--Reykjavik.

Authors:  T F Lang; S Sigurdsson; G Karlsdottir; D Oskarsdottir; A Sigmarsdottir; J Chengshi; J Kornak; T B Harris; G Sigurdsson; B Y Jonsson; K Siggeirsdottir; G Eiriksdottir; V Gudnason; J H Keyak
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Accurate quantification of width and density of bone structures by computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas N Hangartner; David F Short
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.

Authors:  Cristina Falcinelli; Enrico Schileo; Luca Balistreri; Fabio Baruffaldi; Barbara Bordini; Marco Viceconti; Ugo Albisinni; Francesco Ceccarelli; Luigi Milandri; Aldo Toni; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Geographical variation in DXA bone mineral density in young European men and women. Results from the Network in Europe on Male Osteoporosis (NEMO) study.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Jose A da Silva; Kim Brixen; David M Reid; Heikki Kröger; Torben L Nielsen; Marianne Andersen; Claus Hagen; Roman Lorenc; Steven Boonen; Marie-Christine de Vernejoul; Jan J Stepan; Judith Adams; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Patient-specific finite element modeling of bones.

Authors:  Sander Poelert; Edward Valstar; Harrie Weinans; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  8 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of intensity-based 2D-3D registration for intraoperative use in pedicle screw insertion surgeries.

Authors:  Hooman Esfandiari; Carolyn Anglin; Pierre Guy; John Street; Simon Weidert; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Bone adaptation of a biologically reconstructed femur after Ewing sarcoma: Long-term morphological and densitometric evolution.

Authors:  Giordano Valente; Fulvia Taddei; Andrea Roncari; Enrico Schileo; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  A Review of CT-Based Fracture Risk Assessment with Finite Element Modeling and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ingmar Fleps; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.163

4.  Interlaboratory comparison of femur surface reconstruction from CT data compared to reference optical 3D scan.

Authors:  Ehsan Soodmand; Daniel Kluess; Patrick A Varady; Robert Cichon; Michael Schwarze; Dominic Gehweiler; Frank Niemeyer; Dieter Pahr; Matthias Woiczinski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  On the internal reaction forces, energy absorption, and fracture in the hip during simulated sideways fall impact.

Authors:  Ingmar Fleps; William S Enns-Bray; Pierre Guy; Stephen J Ferguson; Peter A Cripton; Benedikt Helgason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus.

Authors:  Nazlı Tümer; Vahid Arbabi; Willem Paul Gielis; Pim A de Jong; Harrie Weinans; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Influence of Bone Morphology on In Vivo Tibio-Femoral Kinematics in Healthy Knees during Gait Activities.

Authors:  Sandro Hodel; Barbara Postolka; Andreas Flury; Pascal Schütz; William R Taylor; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  A novel sideways fall simulator to study hip fractures ex vivo.

Authors:  Ingmar Fleps; Muriel Vuille; Angela Melnyk; Stephen J Ferguson; Pierre Guy; Benedikt Helgason; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.